Mark Sanchez at 13th?

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Zerohero

People are assuming Sanchez would play the first year, even if he was drafted he wouldn't play. And how could Sanchez be rated better then Colt, he only played 16 games.

One went to USC and the other didn't, that's the media's point but is that a serious question??

[Zerohero]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

One went to USC and the other didn't, that's the media's point but is that a serious question??

Yes a very serious question. The only reason Sanchez is so high in the draft is because he is the second best QB to come out(and lately great interview, good pro day), not because he is a better valued player then the OT's, LB's, RB's he will get picked over.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Zerohero

Yes a very serious question. The only reason Sanchez is so high in the draft is because he is the second best QB to come out(and lately great interview, good pro day), not because he is a better valued player then the OT's, LB's, RB's he will get picked over.

How can you say that if none of them have played a down in the NFL yet???

[Zerohero]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

How can you say that if none of them have played a down in the NFL yet???

None of the players are a given, but its been proven over the past 40 years that Line positions are less of a risk in the draft. Of course Sanchez could go on to be a great quarterback. We all know if he gos 2nd or 4th or even 13th, its because there werent many QBs available and not because he was considered the best football player available at that spot.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Zerohero

None of the players are a given, but its been proven over the past 40 years that Line positions are less of a risk in the draft. Of course Sanchez could go on to be a great quarterback. We all know if he gos 2nd or 4th or even 13th, its because there werent many QBs available and not because he was considered the best football player available at that spot.

Yes line is a "lesser" risk but just as equal failure (see Robert Gallery) This isn't 83 there's hardly ever "many" QB's available and people were saying that Jay Culter should not have gone as high as he did but once again, Sanchez is not a better situation than Campbell.

[Zerohero]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Yes line is a "lesser" risk but just as equal failure (see Robert Gallery) This isn't 83 there's hardly ever "many" QB's available and people were saying that Jay Culter should not have gone as high as he did but once again, Sanchez is not a better situation than Campbell.

I agree with you 100 percent, im not a fan of JC but i think he can be very successful this year. Only reason i mentioned Colt because Sanchez would be competing with Colt for backup, not JC for starter.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Zerohero

I agree with you 100 percent, im not a fan of JC but i think he can be very successful this year. Only reason i mentioned Colt because Sanchez would be competing with Colt for backup, not JC for starter.

If that was the case I would throw Danny out of a 3rd story window myself.