Wanted: Playmakers

[diehard]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

I'd have to strongly disagree here. Marshall is better than Moss. Is there really even an argument over that? Royal is hands down already a better wr than ARE. He had some monster games as a rookie. I don't know his numbers but he was near 100 catches. ARE has never even caught 60. Cooley is better than Tony S. But TE's don't have the same impact as top flight wr's do.

Compare Devin Thomas to Eddie Royal... both were rookie WRs last year.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by diehard

Compare Devin Thomas to Eddie Royal... both were rookies last year.

exception that proves the rule, Compare Ryan Leaf to Peyton Manning both were rookies at the same time.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by diehard

Compare Devin Thomas to Eddie Royal... both were rookie WRs last year.

In 2008 Royal caught 91 balls for 980 yards and 5 scores.

In 7 seasons Randle El has never achieved that many catches, those yards, or that many scores in one season.

Rookie or not, Royal wins hands-down.

[diehard]

Originally Posted by Lotus

In 2008 Royal caught 91 balls for 980 yards and 5 scores.

In 7 seasons Randle El has never achieved that many catches, those yards, or that many scores in one season.

Rookie or not, Royal wins hands-down.

Let's see Royal's production with Orton? No defending Marshall huh? He'll have his fair share of balls behind bars sooner or later.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by diehard

Let's see Royal's production with Orton? No defending Marshall huh? He'll have his fair share of balls behind bars sooner or later.

You argued that Randle El was more of a playmaker than Royal. You were wrong in this argument. That is all. No reason for me to mention Marshall.

[diehard]

Originally Posted by Lotus

You argued that Randle El was more of a playmaker than Royal. You were wrong in this argument. That is all. No reason for me to mention Marshall.

My point was (not mentioning Royal) was that Campbell is hindering Moss, Cooley, and REls (and Devin Thomas') productivity. No?