Campbell will ask for trade if Redskins draft a QB

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

So this discussion is over, no?

One would think. But with everything that has happened I'd say Campbell is gone come 2010 no matter what.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

One would think. But with everything that has happened I'd say Campbell is gone come 2010 no matter what.

Yes, but he's the QB for 2009, so the discussion is over. It can be picked up in midseason.

[MTK]

Money always talks. I wouldn't say that it's a guarantee JC is gone next year. If he blows up he will get paid, and who's to say he would want to start over again somewhere else?

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Money always talks. I wouldn't say that it's a guarantee JC is gone next year. If he blows up he will get paid, and who's to say he would want to start over again somewhere else?

Yeah, something tells me Jason Campbell isn't spiteful enough to gamble his career on a new start elsewhere just because he had his feelings hurt, especially if he puts up big numbers. He's a big boy, he knows it's the business.

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Money always talks. I wouldn't say that it's a guarantee JC is gone next year. If he blows up he will get paid, and who's to say he would want to start over again somewhere else?

Is it really starting over when you've learned all the offenses out there

No I really hope JC is a pro-bowler in '09, acknowledging the fact we didn't do a whole lot to help him on offense, and the FO/fanbase/Warpath all get behind him. Character really counts for a lot in my book...

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by The Goat

Is it really starting over when you've learned all the offenses out there

No I really hope JC is a pro-bowler in '09, acknowledging the fact we didn't do a whole lot to help him on offense, and the FO/fanbase/Warpath all get behind him. Character really counts for a lot in my book...

Me too. I'd rather root for a Campbell who I can respect than a douche that I cannot respect.

I think JC is going to be much better next year even if we don't get him more OL help. Needless to say, I hope we do get him that help.

[redskins1974]

[QUOTE=The Goat;550561]Is it really starting over when you've learned all the offenses out there

No I really hope JC is a pro-bowler in '09, acknowledging the fact we didn't do a whole lot to help him on offense, and the FO/fanbase/Warpath all get behind him. Character really counts for a lot in my book...[/QUOTE

Winning games counts alot in my book. Character doesnt help you understand an offense.

[Lotus]

[quote=redskins1974;550671]

Originally Posted by The Goat

Is it really starting over when you've learned all the offenses out there

No I really hope JC is a pro-bowler in '09, acknowledging the fact we didn't do a whole lot to help him on offense, and the FO/fanbase/Warpath all get behind him. Character really counts for a lot in my book...[/QUOTE

Winning games counts alot in my book. Character doesnt help you understand an offense.

Character does help you understand an offense if it means that you are a student of the game rather than hanging out in strip clubs with Pacman.

[redskins1974]

[quote=Lotus;550684]

Originally Posted by redskins1974

Character does help you understand an offense if it means that you are a student of the game rather than hanging out in strip clubs with Pacman.

well apparently it hasnt helped JC yet....this game is about wins and losses.

i know, i know, JC is going to be a pro bowl QB this year.....just like everyone predicted last year. blah blah blah

[SmootSmack]

on a somewhat related note, we may actually still end up with Leftwich (as a backup), long shot but possible

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

on a somewhat related note, we may actually still end up with Leftwich (as a backup), long shot but possible

Huh?

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

on a somewhat related note, we may actually still end up with Leftwich (as a backup), long shot but possible

Is there a reason that you're always so vague? haha

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by tryfuhl

Is there a reason that you're always so vague? haha

Signing him was a smokescreen to make people think they (the Bucs) didn't want a QB. His contract isn't guaranteed and they may cut him now.

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Signing him was a smokescreen to make people think they (the Bucs) didn't want a QB. His contract isn't guaranteed and they may cut him now.

I think what's meant is whether you're implying the FO wishes to sign another QB who could potentially start (yeah i know it was previously stated Leftwich would only be a backup but honestly I don't know anyone dumb enough to take the words of the FO to heart).

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by The Goat

I think what's meant is whether you're implying the FO wishes to sign another QB who could potentially start (yeah i know it was previously stated Leftwich would only be a backup but honestly I don't know anyone dumb enough to take the words of the FO to heart).

No I don't think we really want Leftwich, or would sign him. Just that he could be available.