![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Odenton, MD
Age: 47
Posts: 416
|
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?
Betts has been around a while and has never broken through. He filled in for clinton and played his ass off in a contract year. He should've been traded after that and we could have got good value for him. Not now though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,030
|
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?
He would be expendable if the Skins drafted properly...but they didn't...so...we need him
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?
Who didn't we draft and where that you would have replaced him with? I'm not a big Betts fan, but just curious.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?
So if the Skins had drafted a RB in the 3rd round, you would be sending Betts packing? Otherwise you're telling me that you would have been willing to take Knowshon or Wells at #13. How would you have drafted "properly" that right now at this instant you'd be willing to get rid of Ladell Betts.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 726
|
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?
The NFL is clearly moving away from the 1 back system. While portis is great, he can't withstand the punishment of an entire NFL season as 25+ carry per game back and still function at the level he's accustomed. Not only do we need a capable backup, we need an explosive robin to Portis' batman. I guess what I'm saying is not only is Betts not expendable, we should be looking for an explosive upgrade.
__________________
in writing these daily letters and trying to make them interesting it is always possible that some sentiment may occur which has not received the severe and deliberate scrutiny and reconsideration which should attach to a State Paper. - Churchill |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?
Quote:
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 643
|
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?
Ladell is only expendable...once we acquire a suitable replacement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?
We all know Portis is the man. Unless he gets hurt.
Betts is a great second stringer. Yes, he filled in admirably while Portis was hurt which is why I would keep him and he has the ability to be utilized as a KR/PR. Unless we find someone else who is as good or better he's on the team. I totally agree with those of you who keep saying Rock is a leader. No question. I totally agree with those who say Rock is one of the best special teamers. No question. The only issue I have is the fact he is not that great of a RB. The question I pose is if we could find someone else who can do KR and PR as good or better then Rock can we let him go? There is no questoin he's not a great leader, but we have leaders all over the field including special teams. If anyone was expendable in the RB position I would think it would be Rock only cause he is 3rd string, and only performs one job admirably and that being a KR. He does not even do the PR duties. If the team wanted a slasher/scat back then I would hope it is one of the two Aldridge or Dorsey to take over the 3rd stringer position. Then the team can play Portis, when he gets tired put Betts in, and if they need a change of pace put Aldridge or Dorsey in whoever wins the spot. Somewhere in there I would like to find a young RB for the future to groom to replace Portis and Betts. Now "IF" Mason should happen to step up and play better then Betts then keep Mason. I doubt that will happen as much of a Mason fan as I am. If they could find another RB who is younger to start to groom then fine. I remember recently the majority of you guys wanted the team to get younger. Now no one is expendable. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
|
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?
Is there ever a good time to fumble?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?
On the one yard line, the football can roll under the defenders feet and your teammate picks that sucker up for a touchdown. Ahhhh-haaaa!
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?
I'm sure that Betts tells himself, "Now is a good time to fumble. No one will mind..."
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 51
|
Re: Do You think Betts is Expendable?
Anybody is replaceable..and the rb market is a thick one.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|