Life After People (History Channel)

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by jsarno

This confused me. Eat drink and be merry was because his doom was EXTREMELY imminant. Not millions of years later. I had to have missed something somewhere cause I am left scratching my head at this comment.

You made the comment:

I would argue that if Christ's resurrection was indeed a hoax, we are not pitiful, but lived a good life and we are all worm food anyway so it won't matter.

I responded:

Well, again Paul disagrees with you as well, and lays the foundation of the eat, drink, and be merry now for tomorrow you die philosophy.

I guess you were using it to say not to be scared, but my response was directed at you saying a person living for Christ would not be pitiful. Clearly, if you are living and directing your life based on a fallacy then others would call that pitiful.

[jsarno]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

You made the comment:


I responded:


I guess you were using it to say not to be scared, but my response was directed at you saying a person living for Christ would not be pitiful. Clearly, if you are living and directing your life based on a fallacy then others would call that pitiful.

OK, I get your point. Sorry I missed it before.
I still don't see it as "pitiful", but someone must live their life for something right? I think those that live it with no direction or purpose...well that's pitiful. But to each his own right?

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by jsarno

OK, I get your point. Sorry I missed it before.
I still don't see it as "pitiful", but someone must live their life for something right? I think those that live it with no direction or purpose...well that's pitiful. But to each his own right?

I would agree with you on that. and of course, I do believe Christ rose, so the argument becomes moot.