SI's Best & Worst Owners

[FRPLG]

Actually what this all highlites to me is this...the only thing that matters in the NFL is Superbowls.

Make the playoffs every year, reach the conference finals a bunch, lose a SB, never win a ring...all of that is essentially equal to not making the playoffs. We're not happy, they're not happy. Why? Because nothing matters other than winning SBs. I wouldn't take what the Eagles have done over what we have done..it is similarly frustrating to me either way.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by FRPLG

Actually what this all highlites to me is this...the only thing that matters in the NFL is Superbowls.

Make the playoffs every year, reach the conference finals a bunch, lose a SB, never win a ring...all of that is essentially equal to not making the playoffs. We're not happy, they're not happy. Why? Because nothing matters other than winning SBs. I wouldn't take what the Eagles have done over what we have done..it is similarly frustrating to me either way.

Would you say that ONE ring changes all that, or if you win one time in 25 years as an owner (like say, had Pat Bowlen only won a single SB with Elway), you are still thrown in the majority class of non-winners.

Because there's the Kraft's and the Rooney's, and they win consistently. But the Irsays, and the Biscotti's, and the Glazers of the world win periodically. And you don't often hear those names out in front of the Bowlens, Rooney's and Krafts of the world.