![]() |
|
|||||||
| Parking Lot Off-topic chatter pertaining to movies, TV, music, video games, etc. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: the new health care?
Obamaites can call me a naysayer if they please, but to me this statement is simply foolish:
"Our health care system is broken," Obama said. "We are not going to rest until we've delivered the kind of health care reform that's going to bring down costs for families, improve quality, affordability, accessibility for all Americans." Pelosi: House taking up health care by late July - Capitol Hill- msnbc.com Sorry, you cannot decrease costs and increase quality of care and service. Do I hope I am wrong? Sure. Do I think this is a utopian statement that is either intentionally misleading or so incredibly naive as to be idiotic? Yes. How does he intend to fund this pollyanish plan? Through a mix of tax increases and restrictions on current tax breaks. The biggest is repealling all or a portion of the tax-break for employer based health care payments. Essentially increasing premiums for this type of insurance (whether I am paying the insurer or the govt. or a combination thereof, the cost for insurance increases). As FRPLG said, one of the fundamental problems is that people are looking for a Ferrari but seem to think they can get it at the cost of Hyundai. If we want top quality universal health care coverage, it comes with an incredible price. I don't see the vast majority of americans willing to pay that price. In fact, I don't see the vast majority of insured Americans (82% or approximately 202 million) willing to increase their costs for what will result in a benefit to minority of americans (18%, approximately 46 million) and a likely detriment to themselves (i.e. more costs or worse, more costs and worse benefits). Is reform necessary, sure - every system needs should be reviewed to ensure or try for improvement. Is creating a universal national health care policy funded by tax increases and restrictions on benefits the answer? Not in my opinion. Rather, focus on cutting medical costs by revamping doctor oversight which will help lower litigation cost and thus lower malpractice rates and payouts. Find ways to lower the costs to become a medical professional. Possilby create a workman's comp type system for malpractice awards (just throwing that one out there off the cuff)- i.e. get rid of the traditional defenses to malpractice and require only that an injury occurred to get a payout, in return, the payouts will be set up like worker's comp. no puni's. These two thing may help cut down the cost of malpractice insurance which, in turn, cut down fees which will cut down costs to insurers. With costs lowered, insurance becomes more affordable and fewer people are uninsured. The emphasis, of course, is first to lower prices then find ways to cover the remainder. Personally, I just don't see any of it happening. Far too many vested interests in the current system. Much will be talked about but I doubt any real change will come.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|