Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Rank the NFC East teams position by position....

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-25-2009, 03:59 PM   #1
diehard
The Starter
 
diehard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
Re: Rank the NFC East teams position by position....

This year it will show we're a better team on the field rather than on paper...
diehard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 04:03 PM   #2
Brian Orakpo
Guest
 
Brian Orakpo's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Rank the NFC East teams position by position....

Quote:
Originally Posted by diehard View Post
This year it will show we're a better team on the field rather than on paper...
Yeah I think so too. It really all depends on Campbell though. I think the defense will be top 3 this year. If the offense can score 20 ppg this year we would be set.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2009, 04:57 PM   #3
pick-ups
Camp Scrub
 
pick-ups's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 31
Re: Rank the NFC East teams position by position....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Orakpo View Post
Yeah I think so too. It really all depends on Campbell though. I think the defense will be top 3 this year. If the offense can score 20 ppg this year we would be set.
Wouldn't shock me at all.

I think with each team it'll come down to who's hot and avoids crucial injuries.
pick-ups is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.21193 seconds with 11 queries