Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins signing rookie class of 2009

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-13-2009, 05:08 PM   #1
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Redskins signing rookie class of 2009

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
My perception of Williams is not much different than yours. But, I think the 4 WR stuff that Zorn wants to run, to an extent, will require a player like Williams to run. Right now, the predominant theory is that our 4 WR sets will include 1) Moss, 2) Randle El, 3) Thomas, 4) Kelly, and 5) Cooley. But, I have to wonder if that's the best use of our personnel. These are pretty much all third or fourth down and 6+ yard situations, so maybe in this case, ARE should come off the field for a more reliable hands guy like Williams who has made a career of moving the chains.

Additionally, what if someone is injured, and/or our young guys still can't lineup in the right place? There's nothing wrong with the four aforementioned players making our 4 WR set, but perhaps we should have a contingency plan in case one of them becomes injured or a weak link. Williams, could catch 20-25 balls for us as a *4th WR.

Plus, since there are 10-12 in-season roster transactions for any team, he could be a guy who gets released if the guys in front of him all exceed expectations. No harm there.

Again, I don't think we'd be rostering him instead of a special teams player. Last year, we went with 4 RB most of the season, with Shaun Alexander. This year, I think we'll go with 6 WRs instead.

Of course, San Diego might be willing to trade Kassim Osgood for a late round pick. We've thrown picks at lesser needs before, so I'd only be moderately surprised if we did that.
All good points, and actually I think the WR who can do (has shown he can do) the special teams "dirty work" like Thrash to me is Devin Thomas. I thought he had some nice glimpses on teams in games last year. But of course the hope (not yours of course since you hate DT ) is that Thomas will be the #2 or #3.

Of course, we'll need 5 WRs when my boy Chase is running the spread offense!

I think Hagans might just make the team
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2009, 07:54 PM   #2
DBUCHANON101
The Starter
 
DBUCHANON101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
Re: Redskins signing rookie class of 2009

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
All good points, and actually I think the WR who can do (has shown he can do) the special teams "dirty work" like Thrash to me is Devin Thomas. I thought he had some nice glimpses on teams in games last year. But of course the hope (not yours of course since you hate DT ) is that Thomas will be the #2 or #3.

Of course, we'll need 5 WRs when my boy Chase is running the spread offense!

I think Hagans might just make the team
LOL..Is the NFL ready? But for that to happen Colt would have to send Collins packing and Chase would be the #3. JMO
DBUCHANON101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 05:03 AM   #3
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins signing rookie class of 2009

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
All good points, and actually I think the WR who can do (has shown he can do) the special teams "dirty work" like Thrash to me is Devin Thomas. I thought he had some nice glimpses on teams in games last year. But of course the hope (not yours of course since you hate DT ) is that Thomas will be the #2 or #3.

Of course, we'll need 5 WRs when my boy Chase is running the spread offense!

I think Hagans might just make the team
I think, using DT on special teams, at least this year, would be using our personnel in a way where everyone could succeed. Of course, we'll just use Thomas to block Kelly when running 3 WR sets. In essence, that's the problem with drafting a guy that high: even if his play doesn't warrant it, he's going to get a chance.

Of course, based purely on the field product from last year, Kelly doesn't deserve anything either, but you know I've long held the belief that: if you have to wait until you have the player on the team to know where he stands, you're already behind in the NFL game. Which was really my whole beef with the Thomas pick. It's also why I said, after the Kelly pick (tongue-in-cheek) that we "were already admitting a mistake" to paraphrase myself. My whole issue was that we were going to take him, immediately and continually overrate him because we took him, and our offense would suffer because of it.

Of course, things are never as black and white as my edgy writing style would make them seem. There ARE ways we can develop Thomas. There ARE things that Devin Thomas can do to help this team win ball games (see his misdirection TD run). He can be a role player for us. But NFL teams [not just the Redskins] don't often behave in a way that would make me think it's likely that we do anything but try to fit him into a mold that he's simply not good enough to handle, and thusly we just waste a bunch of plays in games with him. A lot of my draft projections make the assumption that a NFL team will use a player a certain way, regardless of how his skill set suggests he should be used.

We took Devin Thomas in the second round, and we're trying to move him along at the speed of a second round receiver, which seems like just complicating the original mistake of badly over-drafting. I think the team would be prudent to take your advice, make him the next James Thrash, let him taste NFL success first, and THEN if he starts to light up his teammates in practice, use him on offense accordingly. Let him perfect a small section of the route tree, and he can come off the bench and help us with our big plays.

Unfortunately, no, this is not going to happen. Smaller chance than Hagans actually making the team

BTW, when did you 180 on Chase?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.

Last edited by GTripp0012; 06-14-2009 at 05:16 AM.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.41322 seconds with 11 queries