Romo gets dissed again.

[53Fan]

Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101

I love when ppl use the rings to say a player is better than another head to head.
SB's are a TEAM ACHIEVEMENT!!

Bradshaw has 4 rings but i wouldnt put him in the top 5 all time.

Exactly. Has any QB, no matter how good he is, ever won a Super Bowl with a sucky team? Even Marino couldn't do it.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by 53Fan

Exactly. Has any QB, no matter how good he is, ever won a Super Bowl with a sucky team? Even Marino couldn't do it.

Marino ,got to the super bowl as did McNabb..............Romo ...who is whom we are discussing........has not won a playoff game.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Marino ,got to the super bowl as did McNabb..............Romo ...who is whom we are discussing........has not won a playoff game.

Did you know that if the Cowboys lose their next playoff game, they will set an NFL record for most consecutive playoff losses at 7?

While I hope that the Cowpatties do not make the playoffs, it will be sweet if/when they set that record for futility.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Lotus

Did you know that if the Cowboys lose their next playoff game, they will set an NFL record for most consecutive playoff losses at 7?

While I hope that the Cowpatties do not make the playoffs, it will be sweet if/when they set that record for futility.

You serious? I cant wait to share this fact with Homo fans I know

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by Lotus

Did you know that if the Cowboys lose their next playoff game, they will set an NFL record for most consecutive playoff losses at 7?

While I hope that the Cowpatties do not make the playoffs, it will be sweet if/when they set that record for futility.

What a great stat. Hell yeah. I have a feeling that the Giants and Dallas will be the 3rd and 4th place teams in the division this year. If Dallas is in 3rd and makes the wild card somehow, I could definitely see them losing in the first round.

[skinsfaninok]

"What a great stat. Hell yeah. I have a feeling that the Giants and Dallas will be the 3rd and 4th place teams in the division this year. If Dallas is in 3rd and makes the wild card somehow, I could definitely see them losing in the first round."[/quote] GMScud

Man I sure hope so. I do believe that our Offense should be better and we know our D will be awesome. If we can score 20 pts a game we will win 10+ games..

The Giants offense is a ? because ELI is a average at best QB and they have no WR 's at all.

Dallas will win 9 or 10 games though and Philly should as well, but what do you expect it's the EAST!!!!!!

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

"What a great stat. Hell yeah. I have a feeling that the Giants and Dallas will be the 3rd and 4th place teams in the division this year. If Dallas is in 3rd and makes the wild card somehow, I could definitely see them losing in the first round."

sorry.............

[53Fan]

Originally Posted by GMScud

What a great stat. Hell yeah. I have a feeling that the Giants and Dallas will be the 3rd and 4th place teams in the division this year. If Dallas is in 3rd and makes the wild card somehow, I could definitely see them losing in the first round.

It's becoming a tradition.

[sandtrapjack]

Originally Posted by Lotus

Did you know that if the Cowboys lose their next playoff game, they will set an NFL record for most consecutive playoff losses at 7?

While I hope that the Cowpatties do not make the playoffs, it will be sweet if/when they set that record for futility.

What you say is true.
But they still are the top team in playoff history at:

Total Wins (32)
Most consecutive seasons in the playoffs (9)
Most games (56)
Most seasons in the playoffs (29)

Gotta take the good with the bad I suppose.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by sandtrapjack

What you say is true.
But they still are the top team in playoff history at:
.

No ,not really.NFL has been around along time,count the the teams and game since it started in 1927,not just since the super bowl was formed.

[sandtrapjack]

Originally Posted by Giantone

No ,not really.NFL has been around along time,count the the teams and game since it started in 1927,not just since the super bowl was formed.

Yes and no. By doing that you discount half the league. The NFL did not REALLY come into being until the merger.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by sandtrapjack

Yes and no. By doing that you discount half the league.

So , do you mean we start over every time a new team comes in?The NFL has been around since 1927...teams have come and gone but the league started in 1927 and that is when the records started. So ...ahhhhhhh no.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by 53Fan

Exactly. Has any QB, no matter how good he is, ever won a Super Bowl with a sucky team? Even Marino couldn't do it.

Eli?

Kidding.

Uh, Brady's first SB winning team was pretty run of the mill, and not all that much better in the first round of the playoffs. I think, moreover, there have been plenty of near-miss super bowl stories from not-so-great teams, like Marino, as you mentioned, but also Warner this year, the 2003 Panthers, the 1985 and 1996 Patriots as well.

I guess the Raiders of 1980 would probably be called the "worst" super bowl winner of all time, but Jim Plunkett isn't exactly on the verge of Canton. Anyway, looks like your big picture point holds. Downright sucky teams don't win the SB.

[hooskins]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Eli?

Kidding.

Uh, Brady's first SB winning team was pretty run of the mill, and not all that much better in the first round of the playoffs. I think, moreover, there have been plenty of near-miss super bowl stories from not-so-great teams, like Marino, as you mentioned, but also Warner this year, the 2003 Panthers, the 1985 and 1996 Patriots as well.

I guess the Raiders of 1980 would probably be called the "worst" super bowl winner of all time, but Jim Plunkett isn't exactly on the verge of Canton. Anyway, looks like your big picture point holds. Downright sucky teams don't win the SB.

Define good, because they played very well and were coached well. That is a good team. If you are talking talent, sure I agree.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by hooskins

Define good, because they played very well and were coached well. That is a good team. If you are talking talent, sure I agree.

There's probably something to Cowher and Martz getting outcoached in the playoffs there. By run of the mill, I mean "fringe playoff team for most of the regular season."

Of course, you win your division, you get to the playoffs, but I don't think that if it happened a year later (after the divisional reorganization) that they would have had a bye in the playoffs, and without that bye week, there's more or less zero chance of that team coming out of the AFC.

What they started, of course, was the launching pad of more than a couple hall of fame careers, and the very genesis of one of the best 5 year runs in NFL history under Brady, but I think that team was more in the right place at the right time than anything else.

Though I want to extend full credit for playing THE perfect game against the Rams, much like the Giants played THE perfect game against the Pats 6 years later.