Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Colt's Game Performance

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-16-2009, 09:45 PM   #1
DBUCHANON101
The Starter
 
DBUCHANON101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
Re: Colt's Game Performance

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
DBuch, I am not a JC koolaid drinker. When JC makes a mistake I am happy to call him out.

Hatred makes people say and do foolish things. In your case, your utter contempt for Campbell repeatedly has led you to say some foolish things about quarterbacking.

Why do you hate Campbell so much?
Lets just take off the JC and CB goggles, put down the Koolaid and say the wrs were open for big plays and the QB's didnt get it done. Hopefully they improve and are able to take advantage of those situations in the future when it counts.

This was my earlier post on this thread. I said BOTH JC AND CB made high throws that could have been for big plays when the wr/te were open with nothing but green in front of them.
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on.
DBUCHANON101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2009, 10:04 PM   #2
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Colt's Game Performance

Quote:
Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101 View Post
Lets just take off the JC and CB goggles, put down the Koolaid and say the wrs were open for big plays and the QB's didnt get it done. Hopefully they improve and are able to take advantage of those situations in the future when it counts.

This was my earlier post on this thread. I said BOTH JC AND CB made high throws that could have been for big plays when the wr/te were open with nothing but green in front of them.
I heard you the first time.

The point is, JC's throw to Hagans wasn't bad, Hagans hands were. Saying that you critiqued both JC and Colt doesn't change things if your critique of JC is off the mark.

This point prompted my question which I must now repeat: why do you hate JC so much?
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny

Last edited by Lotus; 08-16-2009 at 10:11 PM.
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2009, 10:43 PM   #3
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
Re: Colt's Game Performance

Quote:
Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101 View Post
Lets just take off the JC and CB goggles, put down the Koolaid and say the wrs were open for big plays and the QB's didnt get it done. Hopefully they improve and are able to take advantage of those situations in the future when it counts.

This was my earlier post on this thread. I said BOTH JC AND CB made high throws that could have been for big plays when the wr/te were open with nothing but green in front of them.
I think you've become a victim of your hate for Jason Campbell. Seems like it is hard for some folks to take any of your comments unbiased given your posting history on the subject.

That being said, I think it is a bit silly for either side (those for and against JC) to be arguing about one throw in preseason.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.60173 seconds with 11 queries