Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack
Maybe you could try adding something of substance to the discussion. Take a hint from saden. Instead, you throw out assumptions and then when they're refuted, you say "Oh well anyone can post a link from the Internet."
|
The funny part was: "I don't post links, I READ. I don't get my news from the internet. You can pull random links to support your theory quite easily however. " ??? So, it's 2009, yet you don't read news on the internet, and those who do are somehow less informed or something?
Not sure how posting links from multiple sources proving point(s) somehow invalidates an argument. Doesn't make sense to me.