![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: WR Depth Chart
Do you guys think we could have the second coming of the "posse" here. God it has been so long since we have had more than one WR that has had good production. Since Gibbs 2.0 arrived it's the Portis, Cooley, Moss Show. I would love to see a second coming of Monk, Clark, and Sanders.
Could this group have the talent. Breaking it down Clark = Moss, Monk= Kelly, Clark = Are. I was a kid back in the 80's but I remember that Clark was our deep threat. Monk was the man in the middle who caught everything ( he seemed to be the guy who always converted on third downs and my personal favorite of the 3 ). Sanders I can't seem to remeber what he did best other than being on the field making plays. I still remember those guys all putting up a 1000 yards in one season. Man those were the days. The days when we were feared and always talked about as being one of the best teams in football. I long for that once again.
__________________
Just win. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: WR Depth Chart
Quote:
. I think our current group can be effective but I don't think ARE has the same explosiveness or talent as Sanders. Monk did everything well, block, run routes, catch, and was a quiet lead-by-example team leader, Kelly has some HoF shoes to fill there. Clark and Moss are a good comparison, speed-wise very similar, but I think Clark was a better route-runner and had a little more "nastyness" to him.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|