Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Which NFC East team is most likely to implode

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-30-2009, 11:16 AM   #1
sandtrapjack
The Starter
 
sandtrapjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
Re: Which NFC East team is most likely to implode

Washington, QB is under the gun. The team tried to replace him twice in the offseason. Zorn is going to be on the hot seat, especially if the offense stumbles in the first few weeks of the season.

Only team in the division where BOTH starting QB and Coach are under the microscope.

Second would be Philly, the Vick "circus" will have its affect. It was obvious at the signing presser that the Eagles owner did the deal under extreme duress. McNabb is making offensive calls on the sidelines and actually has more authority than the O-Coordinator.
sandtrapjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 02:36 PM   #2
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
Re: Which NFC East team is most likely to implode

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandtrapjack View Post
Washington, QB is under the gun. The team tried to replace him twice in the offseason. Zorn is going to be on the hot seat, especially if the offense stumbles in the first few weeks of the season.

Only team in the division where BOTH starting QB and Coach are under the microscope.
I don't think Washington would implode for a few reasons. First, the expectations are so low. Second, we don't have a TO, Pacman, or Brandon Marshall kind of guy who is going to cause a ton of drama.

Dallas, on the other hand, is under enormous pressure to produce a playoff victory. Dallas' wide receiver corps is the worst in the division, and that's saying a lot. They shed a lot of their "bad character" guys in the offseason, but I see big trouble if they swoon in December.

Dallas is a contender, but I think they are the most likely to implode.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 08:57 PM   #3
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Which NFC East team is most likely to implode

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
I don't think Washington would implode for a few reasons. First, the expectations are so low. Second, we don't have a TO, Pacman, or Brandon Marshall kind of guy who is going to cause a ton of drama.

Dallas, on the other hand, is under enormous pressure to produce a playoff victory. Dallas' wide receiver corps is the worst in the division, and that's saying a lot. They shed a lot of their "bad character" guys in the offseason, but I see big trouble if they swoon in December.

Dallas is a contender, but I think they are the most likely to implode.

This is exactly why I don't count them as "in the running." Their star WR now is getting all banged up and hurt by rookies. LOL
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 08:53 AM   #4
sandtrapjack
The Starter
 
sandtrapjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
Re: Which NFC East team is most likely to implode

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
I don't think Washington would implode for a few reasons. First, the expectations are so low. Second, we don't have a TO, Pacman, or Brandon Marshall kind of guy who is going to cause a ton of drama.

Dallas, on the other hand, is under enormous pressure to produce a playoff victory. Dallas' wide receiver corps is the worst in the division, and that's saying a lot. They shed a lot of their "bad character" guys in the offseason, but I see big trouble if they swoon in December.

Dallas is a contender, but I think they are the most likely to implode.
This is the NFC East my friend. One of only 2 divisions in the past several years to send 3 of 4 teams to the playoffs practically every year. There is no greater pressure to produce than in the NFC East.

Teams like Cincy, Cleveland, Kansas City, Houston can publicly state "we are rebuilding" and get away with it for 3 or 4 years. But "rebuilding" is simply not a luxury the teams in the NFC East have. You will never hear that phrase used from the 4 teams in this division. All 4 teams rank in the top 10 in NFL Franchises for revenue. All 4 teams have the highest following than any other division. Failure is not an option.

What, you do not think that if Washington does not make the post season that Zorn will be listed as one of the coaches on the hot seat?

How many threads have we seen on this site alone that state the if Zorn does not come through that Shannahan will get the call from Snyder? And Zorn is only in his second year as a head coach.

Think about it. When you read or hear the media talk about other teams in the NFL, they classify a playoff BERTH as a successful season. But in the NFC East, anything less than playoff wins and Super Bowls is a failure.

They don't call it the NFC "Beast" for nothing.
sandtrapjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 01:05 PM   #5
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,657
Re: Which NFC East team is most likely to implode

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
I don't think Washington would implode for a few reasons. First, the expectations are so low. Second, we don't have a TO, Pacman, or Brandon Marshall kind of guy who is going to cause a ton of drama.

Dallas, on the other hand, is under enormous pressure to produce a playoff victory. Dallas' wide receiver corps is the worst in the division, and that's saying a lot. They shed a lot of their "bad character" guys in the offseason, but I see big trouble if they swoon in December.

Dallas is a contender, but I think they are the most likely to implode.
I don't think so. Expectations are high around here.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 01:53 PM   #6
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Which NFC East team is most likely to implode

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
I don't think so. Expectations are high around here.

I think last yr expectations were low until week 6. They sky rocketed. The team imploded. This yr I think expectations are middle to low knowing how last yr turned out. Some are calling for Zorn's head already cause they don't think he can get it done. Many have called for JC's head also.

Yes, there is anxiety in the air for Zorn and Campbell I'm sure to have a good season or possibly get canned ....unless the owner has already told Zorn not to worry. Campbell might be stressed or he might be looking at this yr as a resume. Do good get paid. Do ok get another job somewhere else as second string.

I just don't see everyone expecting a SB out of the Skins. I know us fans might be but I'm talking about all the news pundits. Everyone has picked the Skins to finish last in the division. Which kinda has some of us fans riled up but expect that every yr now.

but Dallas is picked to lead the division every yr and the Giants have taken it the last 2. This yr the Eagles are being picked to lead the division and go to the SB. If you ask me the Giants still look better then the Eagles and the Eagles either look as good or worse then us. I just get the feeling Dallas will be the bottom feeder this yr due to losing T.O. ...Roy Williams is already getting injured and complaining. Wait until he gets hit by some real safeties in this league.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2009, 08:48 PM   #7
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Which NFC East team is most likely to implode

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandtrapjack View Post
Washington, QB is under the gun. The team tried to replace him twice in the offseason. Zorn is going to be on the hot seat, especially if the offense stumbles in the first few weeks of the season.

Only team in the division where BOTH starting QB and Coach are under the microscope.

Second would be Philly, the Vick "circus" will have its affect. It was obvious at the signing presser that the Eagles owner did the deal under extreme duress. McNabb is making offensive calls on the sidelines and actually has more authority than the O-Coordinator.
You've got to be kidding us right? I'll be honest I don't like Dallas but I would not pick them to be the ones to implode cause I honestly don't think they will be in the running this yr. To me implosion means a team expected to do well and ends up having a horrible year. So with that in mind....everyone is picking the Eagles to win the division and end up in the SB. Maybe they will fool me but I don't see the high flying Eagles we saw in the SB a few yrs ago. I see implosion written all over them.

The Giants are a close second. I still think they are the team to beat but losing two WR's of the caliber they did is going to hurt them. They have been taken down a notch.

I don't think anyone can say the Skins since most people had the Skins finishing last in the division this yr and honestly from what I'm seeing so far it looks like (again in my oppinion) we may be the team to beat if we can just get the first win against the Giants.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2009, 01:02 PM   #8
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,657
Re: Which NFC East team is most likely to implode

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandtrapjack View Post
Washington, QB is under the gun. The team tried to replace him twice in the offseason. Zorn is going to be on the hot seat, especially if the offense stumbles in the first few weeks of the season.

Only team in the division where BOTH starting QB and Coach are under the microscope.

Second would be Philly, the Vick "circus" will have its affect. It was obvious at the signing presser that the Eagles owner did the deal under extreme duress. McNabb is making offensive calls on the sidelines and actually has more authority than the O-Coordinator.
I'd say it's between Dallas and Washington. But you bring up some good points. We could easily implode if we get off to a slow start.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.30574 seconds with 11 queries