Vinny tips his hand on the final 53

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by dmvskinzfan08

It does mean sense. Because Neither Betts or Cartwright are doing squat. Betts can catch a screen pass that's it. So why do we sign Aldridge? Why was Mason gtting some rushes the other game. Just put one and two together and stop being cynical. Dimwit

I see. So what you're saying is we signed Alridge to replace Betts or Cartwright?

[dmvskinzfan08]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I see. So what you're saying is we signed Alridge to replace Betts or Cartwright?

Its a possibility. If not why wouldn't we stick with what we had. But the thing that bothers me is that we didn't sign a OL to replace RT. But we will probably have to eventually. So someone would have to be cut loose. I think the depth at the other positions is critical.

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by smootsmack

what? That didn't make sense.

Besides...robert henson isn't a member of this site, dimwit

lmao!

[dmvskinzfan08]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

What? That didn't make sense.

Besides...Robert Henson isn't a member of this site, dimwit

This doesn't make any sense. Very corny!! I know you are referring to the tweet he sent. But a member of this forum called me a dimwit because I said we need to keep Mason and another back (either Alridge or Dorsey).

[gibbsisgod]

Originally Posted by dmvskinzfan08

Should realize the reason we signed Aldridge today? it wasn't because Betts or Rock were that awesome. Is that egg on your face or your foot in your mouth?

Im not a mod but that DIDN'T make sense. I don't want to speak for others but I think what SS was referring to was how the words you used and how you used them made no sense, not your opinion of the RB situation.

Then you follow it up with this.

It does mean sense

My god man, speak the kings english and don't be so sensetive.

[dmvskinzfan08]

Originally Posted by gibbsisgod

Im not a mod but that DIDN'T make sense. I don't want to speak for others but I think what SS was referring to was how the words you used and how you used them made no sense, not your opinion of the RB situation.

Then you follow it up with this.
My god man, speak the kings english and don't be so sensetive.

Dude is that how you spell sensitive? You have the nerve to talk. LMAO

Should realize the reason we signed Aldridge today? it wasn't because Betts or Rock were that awesome. Is that egg on your face or your foot in your mouth?

I will correct this statement

Some should realize the reason we signed Aldridge today? It wasn't because Betts or Rock were that awesome [end sarcasm]. Is that egg on your face or your foot in your mouth.

This is a response to people saying that Betts and Rock are capable back ups. If so why do we need to sign alridge. Why did Mason get some carries the other game.

Either Vinny is stupid or one of the RBs is going to get cut. Because we have a more pressing need for a OL. So someone will have to go and our depth is needed at other positions on the team.

Does that clear it up? or am I being to sensetive? LMAO

[gibbsisgod]

Originally Posted by dmvskinzfan08

Dude is that how you spell sensitive? You have the nerve to talk. LMAO

Should realize the reason we signed Aldridge today? it wasn't because Betts or Rock were that awesome. Is that egg on your face or your foot in your mouth?

I will correct this statement

Some should realize the reason we signed Aldridge today? It wasn't because Betts or Rock were that awesome [end sarcasm]. Is that egg on your face or your foot in your mouth.

This is a response to people saying that Betts and Rock are capable back ups. If so why do we need to sing alridge. Why did Mason get some carries the other game.

Either Vinny is stupid or one of the RBs is going to get cut. Because we have a more pressing need for a OL. So someone will have to go and our depth is needed at other positions on the team.

Does that clear it up? or am I being to sensetive? LMAO

Ok, I'll give you the spelling error but thats as far as I am going with this whole deal. Thanks

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by gibbsisgod

Ok, I'll give you the spelling error but thats as far as I am going with this whole deal. Thanks

I'll go as far to say that signing Aldrige as the 53rd man to the active squad neither puts egg on my face or a foot in my mouth. That may occur if Aldrige actually plays and actually outperforms CP or Betts.

Quite frankly, signing Aldrige is unlikely to put Aldrige on the field.

[MTK]

I love look at me, pat myelf on the back posts, especially when they make no sense.

[dmvskinzfan08]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

I love look at me, pat myelf on the back posts, especially when they make no sense.

NO it aint look at me pat me on the back posts. It makes total sense. You just dont want it to make sense.

Question: Why would we sign Aldridge if the RBs we had were producing?

Its not pat me on the back post. its more like redemption for me being calle da dimwit and knowing nothing.

If Betts was doing his job and if Rock was able to come in a serve as a RB and do the things the team needed Aldridge woulndn't have been signed. Its a simple as that.


You two and a few others have a habit of ganing up on people on ths baord you dont agree with. Because you two think you are the wizards of Redskins football. We are not goign to keep all these backs. If Aldrige and Mason both get rushign attempts next game or more involved in the offense. Betts or Rock will be gone. becauthey are only taking up Roster space because we have other people who can do their jobs. We need a OL. I rather us let one of them go when we have 5 backs and Betts is not producing and Rock isn't anything special on ST. So if we need a OL someone has to go. it might not be now. But it might be in the near future. But ofcourse this doens't make sense either. But to me nothing will unless you and your cronies say it.

[MTK]

Yawn.

Whatever.

[dmvskinzfan08]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Yawn.

Whatever.

So you took the time to type "Yawn. Whatever". That says it all. Great comeback Narcissist!!

[MTK]

Originally Posted by dmvskinzfan08

So you took the time to type "Yawn. Whatever". That says it all. Great comeback.

Yes, it took me a while but I managed to come up with a brilliant response to an equally brilliant "look at me" post.

Aldridge is not on the team because someone is not doing their job, it's because Thomas went down and a roster spot opened up, and Aldridge was someone that Vinny liked and he was really close to being the 53rd man on the roster a few weeks ago. So the opportunity presented itself to bring him back. Simple as that, no need to look any further.

If it had something to do with Betts or Rock, why are they still on the roster?

[dmvskinzfan08]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Yes, it took me a while but I managed to come up with a brilliant response to an equally brilliant "look at me" post.

Aldridge is not on the team because someone is not doing their job, it's because Thomas went down and a roster spot opened up, and Aldridge was someone that Vinny liked and he was really close to being the 53rd man on the roster a few weeks ago. So the opportunity presented itself to bring him back. Simple as that, no need to look any further.

If it had something to do with Betts or Rock, why are they still on the roster?

Really? They signed him because a roster spot opened up. Why didn't they sign a OL. So you are saying we need all the running backs we have now? If we do choose to sign a OL who you think will be one of the first out the door?

Thats a good question. I will just say this. Time will tell.

We need our depth everywhere. So if a OL is needed. Who are we going to get ride of a DL or one of our "many" rbs?

or maybe Henson..lmao

[MTK]

Originally Posted by dmvskinzfan08

Really? They signed him because a roster spot opened up. Why didn't they sign a OL. So you are saying we need all the running backs we have now? If we do choose to sign a OL who you think will be one of the first out the door?

Thats a good question. I will just say this. Time will tell.

We need our depth everywhere. So if a OL is needed. Who are we going to get ride of a DL or one of our "many" rbs?

or maybe Henson..lmao

The replacement for Thomas is already on the roster, so you don't need to sign an OL just because you put one on IR. Besides, we're already carrying another OL on the practice squad.

If the need for another OL opened up, it's probably Mason or Aldridge that get let go.