Portis for Larry Johnson

MTK · 01-03-2005, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskins_P

I seriously want to know what some of you are smoking......

All I've been hearing lately is trade Portis, trade Lavar. Come on guys let's be a little more realistic.

We would be laughingstocks of the league if we traded LaVar and Portis, not just for the kind of players they are, but for the tremendous cap damage we would do.

Hell, while we're at it let's just cut Brunell, Barrow, Gardner & Samuels. I'd love to see that cap mess.

jdlea · 01-03-2005, 10:20 AM

Why would KC want two of the highest paid backs in the league? They'd have Holmes and Portis. They know they need to upgrade their D. If they made this trade, I think they'd be the laughing stock. If we made it, we'd have to be on crack. Johnson had a good 4 or 5 games, let's give up one of the 5 best runners in the league for him! That's genius.

irish · 01-03-2005, 10:32 AM

Its unfortunate that CP's and LA's (especially) are so high that they are untradable. It would be great to see what the skins could get for LA and to a lesser extent CP.

jdlea · 01-03-2005, 10:52 AM

so now they should trade LaVar Arrington too? Come to think of it...we should. Then we can finish in last forever.

Before all of you go off about how LaVar is overrated, I'd like to remind you that you wanted my head when I said I would rather have Champ than him. Remember, he saved the 2001 season.

Redskins_P · 01-03-2005, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

We would be laughingstocks of the league if we traded LaVar and Portis, not just for the kind of players they are, but for the tremendous cap damage we would do.

Hell, while we're at it let's just cut Brunell, Barrow, Gardner & Samuels. I'd love to see that cap mess.

Matty, we're already the laughingstocks of the league because of the cap mess we'll be in 2006 and not to mention the signing of Brunell. How stupid would we look after giving both Arrington and Portis huge salaries and then trading them?

By the way guys this isn't Madden where you can trade whoever you want and not worry about the salary cap.

Whatever happened to have some continuity?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

01-03-2005, 10:20 AM	#2
jdlea Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, VA Age: 42 Posts: 3,109	Why would KC want two of the highest paid backs in the league? They'd have Holmes and Portis. They know they need to upgrade their D. If they made this trade, I think they'd be the laughing stock. If we made it, we'd have to be on crack. Johnson had a good 4 or 5 games, let's give up one of the 5 best runners in the league for him! That's genius.

01-03-2005, 10:32 AM	#3
irish Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 4,575	Its unfortunate that CP's and LA's (especially) are so high that they are untradable. It would be great to see what the skins could get for LA and to a lesser extent CP.

01-03-2005, 10:52 AM	#4
jdlea Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, VA Age: 42 Posts: 3,109	so now they should trade LaVar Arrington too? Come to think of it...we should. Then we can finish in last forever. Before all of you go off about how LaVar is overrated, I'd like to remind you that you wanted my head when I said I would rather have Champ than him. Remember, he saved the 2001 season.

Portis for Larry Johnson

Locker Room Main Forum