![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 473
|
Quote:
I would also point out that ST's conviction is the same penalty he would have received if he were moderatly drunk. He did not "get off" because he was rich. HOWEVER, by not being convicted of an alcohol related crime, he has remained outside of the league's substance abuse program. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
|
Bottom line - it was the judge's call and based on the report in the paper, it looked like a reasonable person could have (but not neccearily) reached the same conclusion. From the report in the papter, and even if he wasn't a pro athelete, a judge could have thrown it out based on what he saw on the tape.
Truth is, without seeing the tape it is hard to say whether or not this judge cut Taylor slack. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
|
JoeRedskin: I've seen too many friends get caught from an officer lying. They like to saying they have confessions they don't, etc. Are all of them evil? Not at all, just don't take their advice if you're in trouble for a hill of beans. Maybe not most of them, but quite a few I've seen, at least in this area (which isn't exactly the best area to grab them from.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|