![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
Uh he already HAS handled him all by himself. The result....Haynesworth suspended.....Gurode Pro Bowl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
Round one goes to Gurode but that battle was 2006, this is 2009. In 2009 my money is on Fat Albert.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,994
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
Quote:
By the way, did anyone hear Eli Manning on Mike & Mike this morning? He was asked what the Giants did to minimize Haynesworth so much. Eli basically said they did nothing special, that they ran their normal gameplan that they always use against the Redskins. He did say that the 2 early long drives the Giants had (10+ plays each drive) seemed the wear on Haynesworth and that they did not think he was in "Game-Shape" because of AH missing some of training camp. He did acknowledge that AH is a force in the middle, but only a few minor shifts with the TE's set him up in the gap that want AH line up in. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
Quote:
I also doubt that most of the larger interior d lineman in the NFL are in complete game shape at week 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Defense = Disappointment
Quote:
![]() I think we ALL know who got "handled" in that matchup.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|