![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 43
Posts: 2,726
|
Re: Would you rather be 0-2
I don’t know how you sit here and cheer for a 9-7 victory of the rebuilding St. Louis Rams. We have the same problem every season which is the inability to sub-stain TD scoring drives. I’m giving JC a free pass for now because I just can’t seem to understand how we have all these weapons on this team and still fail to do anything with it.
Why spend so many draft picks on pass catchers and fail to get them the ball? Why draft one of the best TE’s in last years draft and only use him as a pass blocker?( Oh I forgot his screen pass on the 5 yard line that resulted in a loss) Where is the two TE set’s? Every Monday I come home from work and there it is; Players and Coaches are saying things like “were close” and “just a few mental lapses to fix and we will see”. Scoring 9 points is not close. We were closer last season. Jim Zorn needs to be held accountable because the plays he’s calling is way, way too predictable. Yeah we won but, you can’t expect to win in the NFL only scoring 9 points.
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Would you rather be 0-2
Quote:
Awful playcalling aside, let's assume perfect offensive execution. Dream scenario, but lets say DT catches his TD, and Sellers catches his. Red Zone playcalling is not one iota better but we score 20 points instead of 9 (assuption -- Suisham makes a FG on that last drive). We win a 20-7 blowout. I'd say that we didn't miss by much. There's not much St. Louis can say that "if we had just did this one thing, we would have beaten them". Yeah, convert that 4th quarter fumble into a TD, and they might have won, but that also would have required them to score the third TD of the year against our defense, which they proved they didn't have the firepower to do.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Would you rather be 0-2
Quote:
So in the Rams locker room there was a conversation that went like this, Rams player 1 - "Man, we should have won that game. If only we didn't fumble that ball away." Rams player 2 - "Oh hells no! Don't you know that was the Redskins Defense out there. No one, and I mean no one scores on them. They LET us march down the field on them only to run down the clock. They knew they could get a fumble whenever they wanted. And don't even think for one second we could have kicked a field goal and won 10-9. They would have blocked it and returned it for a TD. Best Defense of all time! I said ALL TIME." Rams player 1 - "Oh"
__________________
I am a system poster. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Would you rather be 0-2
Quote:
If you don't understand what I'm saying, you can ask me to clarify myself. Otherwise, I'm apparently just supposed to watch you insult me, and then respond to a point I didn't make. You're also assuming that if the Redskins had been down 10-9 in a worst case scenario kind of thing, Suisham would have missed the FG attempt on the final drive. Get real.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 336
|
Re: Would you rather be 0-2
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Would you rather be 0-2
Quote:
__________________
Tardy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 256
|
Re: Would you rather be 0-2
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|