Welcome back Anthony Alridge.........

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by dmvskinzfan08

You are just anal. That's my pet peeve. The sad thing is you don't even know it.

Yes. How about freedom of opinion anal one? If I am saying some racist things, calling women out of there names, cursing like the guy on the cooley blog, or things of that nature fine.

But I think you know what I mean by freedom of speech. I am not offending anyone who is no offending me. I don't disrespect people because of their opinions. That's the issue. If we all had the same opinions why would we need this board? It would be very boring here because we would have nothing to debate.

As far as the finding a park bench. Maybe you should. You seem like a grumpy old man.

Whoa dude. No need to go ballistic. I was just pointing out a fact. A fact which many have ignored and, by doing so, has caused many to be banned. Very simply, it is not your call if you are being offensive, it's the moderators. Thus, a "moderated board". They could ban you today for no other reason than they don't like your grammar.

I would suggest that, having read your posts, you have a low threshold as to what you consider someone being "disrespectful" to you. And just so you know, I am neither anal nor grumpy. You want to differ in opinions fine. But your whole AA threads/posts have been in the nature of "nyah nyah I was right and you were wrong." So if the responses have been less than "respectful", it would appear that is b/c the initial posts did not exactly demand "respectful" responses.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

Whoa dude. No need to go ballistic. I was just pointing out a fact. A fact which many have ignored and, by doing so, has caused many to be banned. Very simply, it is not your call if you are being offensive, it's the moderators. Thus, a "moderated board". They could ban you today for no other reason than they don't like your grammar.

I would suggest that, having read your posts, you have a low threshold as to what you consider someone being "disrespectful" to you. And just so you know, I am neither anal nor grumpy. You want to differ in opinions fine. But your whole AA threads/posts have been in the nature of "nyah nyah I was right and you were wrong." So if the responses have been less than "respectful", it would appear that is b/c the initial posts did not exactly demand "respectful" responses.

LOL. You think?

http://www.thewarpath.net/593339-post96.html

http://www.thewarpath.net/593340-post97.html

[dmvskinzfan08]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

LOL. You think?

http://www.thewarpath.net/593339-post96.html

http://www.thewarpath.net/593340-post97.html

Thanks for the co-sign SS [end sarcasm] :smashfrea

But I do admit to my mistakes. That was actually a good letter. Wish I had saved it in a Word doc.

[dmvskinzfan08]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

Whoa dude. No need to go ballistic. I was just pointing out a fact. A fact which many have ignored and, by doing so, has caused many to be banned. Very simply, it is not your call if you are being offensive, it's the moderators. Thus, a "moderated board". They could ban you today for no other reason than they don't like your grammar.

I would suggest that, having read your posts, you have a low threshold as to what you consider someone being "disrespectful" to you. And just so you know, I am neither anal nor grumpy. You want to differ in opinions fine. But your whole AA threads/posts have been in the nature of "nyah nyah I was right and you were wrong." So if the responses have been less than "respectful", it would appear that is b/c the initial posts did not exactly demand "respectful" responses.

Yeah they could ban me for that. But if they are doing it based on grammar half of this board would be banned..lol

When someone posts a response and their only words are calling someone a name that's different than debating. That's my point.