![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 41
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
I'm pretty much sitting on the fence with Campbell. I'm curious to see how he looks the rest of the way with Jones/Heyer at LT/RT (a big upgrade over Heyer/Williams), especially if Betts continues to start at RB. Either way, the OLine needs to be addressed before they go waste a high draft pick on a QB that will turn into David Carr 2.0 with the terrible line we have now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 158
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Still, I honestly believe Campbell is gone after the season regardless of how he looks over the next seven games (too much damage has been done, for his own good I think he should leave this club), and I honestly believe we are gonna waste a pick on a QB who will suffer behind another patchwork line in 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Odenton, MD
Age: 47
Posts: 416
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,584
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
One thing I am sure of. The Redskins oline has been a major problem for a long long very long time.
The Samuels/Jansen combo was pretty overrated from day one. The line JC has had the fortune to play behind over his entire pro career has been a vastly overrated unit IMO. This year the line is just a freakin nightmare. Who knows how good the guy is? JC isn't any kind of hall of famer, but he has plenty of good skills. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
I argue that it starts and ends with the oline. They shouldn't take all the blame, but I think they were kind of fooling us for many years. Just good enough to not get really exposed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Good post DB 101. It's the exception to the rule when a "mediocre" QB wins the SB.
The only reason this thread is "revived" is b/c Kyle Orton got hurt and didn't play the 2nd half and LB/the oline had a big game yesterday. JC had an average day. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,440
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
his problem is that his stat line is fine but the problem is he misses too many wide open wide receivers - he left 2 touchdowns that I saw on the field: the missed bomb to santana moss and the intentional grounding call where he should have seen Yoder wide open 2 yards from the end zone
__________________
"Tough times don't last but tough people do" -Mike Shanahan HTTR |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
It's funny that this discussion has become Jason Campbell Haters vs. People that think Jason Campbell is an average at best/mediocre all the time QB.
Jason Campbell haters are upset that JC is not having a horrible statistical season, and would like nothing more to rub it in to former Campbell supporters (notice that I said former). But when JC is having a pretty season statistically, it's really hard to completely rub it in...although once again, most supporters of JC are now former supporters. JC haters also continue to make the indirect argument that Campbell is the only reason this team is in the shape it is right now, once again completely overlooking other aspects of the team that are completely wrong. Once again, they have the mentality that 1 good QB + sorry ass team = Championship. As I said, I'm in the JC is an average at best/mediocre all the time QB. I don't think he's going to be back next year and wish him the best. That being said, I have enough of a brain to not babble that he's the doom of the Redskins, and ignore his stats. I also don't forget that the Redskins have never been a passing team, and the team has put all its eggs in the running game (Portis), and the defense (Haynesworth, Orakpo, etc., etc.). If all of you that loathe Jason Campbell (because he's not Brady, Brees, or P. Manning) want to see a change, well then you better hope the team starts building up the offensive line, and spend a lot of resources on an elite QB. That hasn't been the philosophy, otherwise Gibbs would have not brought Brunnel. So stop getting your panties in a bunch JC haters, don't forget that he will be gone next season, or at worst, he'll be carrying the clipboard as the 2nd stringer.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
It's a QB league, just looking at the standings in no order
Tony Romo Kurt Warner Drew Brees P Manning T Brady Rivers Orton Favre Ben R and McNabb are 2nd in their divisions Orton is the guy that jumps out as the odd one there. All of the other teams....good/great QB's. Occasionally you'll get an Orton or a Dilfer. I'd rather win more often than occasionally. Let's look for a new QB that has the potential to be great. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,584
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
But i'd guarantee one of those QB's would make us a better team immediately. We've endured average QB's under Gibbs 2 right? If we would have had a Carson Palmer for our two playoff runs under Gibbs how far could we have gone? We lived w/ an average QB and a great defense and didn't make it to the Championship game. IMO, we could have gone that 2005 season, w/ a better QB. Gibbs had options, he just took the wrong option in MB. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|