Redskins hire offensive consultant

[Giantone]

[quote=CRedskinsRule;604485]Do people not believe Cerrato/Zorn when they say Snyder did not order this, Cerrato wanted it, Zorn accepted (grudgingly I am sure) and Snyder approved it.[quote=CRedskinsRule;604485]



Nope ,nobody should believe them...not about this and not at this time of year.

.

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

This isn't a Snyder meddling situation.

yes it is.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Nope ,nobody should believe them...not about this and not at this time of year..

yes it is.

If Snyder was meddling, he would have fired Zorn already.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Nope ,nobody should believe them...not about this and not at this time of year.

.

yes it is.

no, it's not. Cerrato went and did this, At the most Snyder could have said no not that, but then he is meddling with the way his staff wants to handle it.

[Skinny Tee]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

no, it's not. Cerrato went and did this, At the most Snyder could have said no not that, but then he is meddling with the way his staff wants to handle it.

Bringing in a consultant reeks of a business move...and who is the business man of the year in our front office?

The consultant was Snyder's idea...Sherman Smith was probably Vinny's.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Skinny Tee

Bringing in a consultant reeks of a business move...and who is the business man of the year in our front office?

The consultant was Snyder's idea...Sherman Smith was probably Vinny's.

What proof do you have of this? Oh I forgot we don't need proof to bash Snyder, every move that we don't like gets ascribed to him regardless of what the facts say.

[Skinny Tee]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

What proof do you have of this? Oh I forgot we don't need proof to bash Snyder, every move that we don't like gets ascribed to him regardless of what the facts say.

I'm not Snyder bashing in my statement...you're sensitive.

What proof did we have of the Haynesworth signing?...Our front office said that it was not going to pursue Haynesworth in free agency and then Snyder is dining with his agent the days before free agency started.

Next thing you know we're introducing Albert within hours of the start of free agency.

Our front office has proven their story is unreliable when it comes to player/staff personnel moves. If there was no reason to believe them then there isn't any reason to believe them now.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Skinny Tee

I'm not Snyder bashing in my statement...you're sensitive.

What proof did we have of the Haynesworth signing?...Our front office said that it was not going to pursue Haynesworth in free agency and then Snyder is dining with his agent the days before free agency started.

Next thing you know we're introducing Albert within hours of the start of free agency.

Our front office has proven their story is unreliable when it comes to player/staff personnel moves. If there was no reason to believe them then there isn't any reason to believe them now.

We said we weren't signing Haynesworth?

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

We said we weren't signing Haynesworth?

don't recall that either

I know we hear the thing about Jason Taylor all of the time, but we said that BEFORE Daniels got hurt I believe

[Skinny Tee]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

We said we weren't signing Haynesworth?

Yeah...I remember feeling relieved because they said that they would have the cap space or interest to go after Haynesworth. That was said probably 2 or 3 weeks before free agency started.

Then the story about Snyder dining with Haynesworth's agent broke and the next thing you know we're introducing Haynesworth at Redskins Park.

Our front office definitely said that they were not focused on high priced free agents coming into this past offseason though.