Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins-Chiefs Offensive Review

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-24-2009, 12:43 PM   #1
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Redskins-Chiefs Offensive Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I got a chance to tape record "Playbook" on the NFL network, and got to see the coaches tape for the three plays on the 10 yardline following the 78 yard Portis run.

Our issues can be summed up as the following: we ran three plays, and not one receiver got open. On three plays. On the 10 yard line.

Cooley had single coverage on the first down play, and had a long developing route. A perfect throw would have gotten the TD, but we never had a better chance after that which is sad.

Our receivers have to be the worst group in the league.
So besides O-line which is an obvious need our WR's suck. Why is it that everytime the Skins pick WR's they all suck, unless they dip into FA? Is there any possibility we can salvage them with new management/new WR coach or do they actually suck. Why is it other teams seem to collect decdent WR's like candy and we can't draft a half decent one?

I'm not busting your balls just wondering if any of their lack of success has more to do with Hixon as I believe or is it that our Scouts suck also at picking WR's.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 12:57 PM   #2
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins-Chiefs Offensive Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
So besides O-line which is an obvious need our WR's suck. Why is it that everytime the Skins pick WR's they all suck, unless they dip into FA? Is there any possibility we can salvage them with new management/new WR coach or do they actually suck. Why is it other teams seem to collect decdent WR's like candy and we can't draft a half decent one?

I'm not busting your balls just wondering if any of their lack of success has more to do with Hixon as I believe or is it that our Scouts suck also at picking WR's.
Kelly can be our No. 2 if he ever can stay healthy. His preseason wasn't a mirage, necessarily, but Kelly hasn't been open in about 4 weeks. He's not right.

There's nothing Hixon can really do with Thomas or Kelly, as they just suck right now. It would be nice if he would get Moss to buy into the offense, and we could get a decent receiver out of him. Randle El is doing fine, so that leaves Marko Mitchell as the Stan Hixon test case. If he goes to hell and does nothing this year, then you can probably conclude that Hixon is creating more problems than he is solving.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 08:24 PM   #3
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,653
Re: Redskins-Chiefs Offensive Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Kelly can be our No. 2 if he ever can stay healthy. His preseason wasn't a mirage, necessarily, but Kelly hasn't been open in about 4 weeks. He's not right.

There's nothing Hixon can really do with Thomas or Kelly, as they just suck right now. It would be nice if he would get Moss to buy into the offense, and we could get a decent receiver out of him. Randle El is doing fine, so that leaves Marko Mitchell as the Stan Hixon test case. If he goes to hell and does nothing this year, then you can probably conclude that Hixon is creating more problems than he is solving.
I haven't heard of Kelly's knee being injured. He just can't get open.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 10:13 PM   #4
44Deezel
The Starter
 
44Deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
Re: Redskins-Chiefs Offensive Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
I haven't heard of Kelly's knee being injured. He just can't get open.
And he plays for a team that only managed to score 6 points against the worst Defense in the league. Santana Moss can get open, and he only had 1 reception. Hard to assess anyone's true talent on this team.
__________________
I am a system poster.
44Deezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 10:46 PM   #5
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Redskins-Chiefs Offensive Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44Deezel View Post
And he plays for a team that only managed to score 6 points against the worst Defense in the league. Santana Moss can get open, and he only had 1 reception. Hard to assess anyone's true talent on this team.
I guess I'm agreeing with you. It's hard to assess anyone on this team if the O-line keeps breaking down not giving JC enough time to locate his targets. If JC keeps going through his progressions too quickly. If the WR's are not taught how to get open. etc. etc.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 11:07 PM   #6
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Redskins-Chiefs Offensive Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
I haven't heard of Kelly's knee being injured. He just can't get open.
Well it's his thumb that hurts, but you don't run with your thumbs
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.20079 seconds with 11 queries