![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Sanchez' passing numbers won Offensive Rookie of the Year for Vince Young. And he didn't even have the assistance of a hot dog.
If Campbell ate a hot dog, he'd instantly be the best QB in the division.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Please correct me if I'm wrong, I don't recall if it was you or another poster, but didn't you want Sanchez? 52.8% comp, 6 tds, 10 ints, 7 fumbles. I was dead set against him, and it appears he is proving me right.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 3,007
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
8 of those picks were in just 2 out of 7 games. In five of those 7 games, he has a rating of 84.4, 101.1, 81.4, 87.5 and 114.0. The Bills' game (5 picks, 8.3 rating) seems like an outlier. I know you hate SC, but c'mon man... you're going to use this sample set to discredit a rookie?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
I'm pretty sure Tripp was against Sanchez. Sanchez doesn't fit Tripp's requirements, namely his college experience was very limited
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|