Campbell's numbers dont lie

[Trample the Elderly]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Well, right, but how much of that is because the Philly defense manages to be great every year.

If McNabb had a below .500 win percentage, but was the exact same quarterback, would people still say he was good? I really don't think they would, though certainly, I could be wrong.

None of that matters, at least to me. The only thing that matters to me is having a winning team. McNabb is a winner. Campbell is a loser. If he was so great then he'd not have been trade bait.

No matter what, he's done just like this season. He's shell shocked. There are only two more important games for me. The rest is a throw away season. If anything, I'd rather have the #1 draft pick.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly

None of that matters, at least to me. The only thing that matters to me is having a winning team. McNabb is a winner. Campbell is a loser. If he was so great then he'd not have been trade bait.

No matter what, he's done just like this season. He's shell shocked. There are only two more important games for me. The rest is a throw away season. If anything, I'd rather have the #1 draft pick.

Well if that was all that mattered, you'd just root for Philly. Problem solved.

It's because other things -- like a sense of loyalty -- matter that we put up with an organization we know to be inferior. Of course, you also have to consider that one of the reasons we don't win as much as they do is because we are much slower to plug the non-quarterback holes in our roster.

You don't have to make the assumption that Campbell and McNabb are equal players to see the similarities. I'm certainly not making that assumption, but a lot of the Campbell criticisms apply to McNabb as well.