Freedom of the Press/free speach and destruction of capitalism

[saden1]

Originally Posted by FRPLG

Which part is disagreeable? He didn't call him a murderer or rapist or something. He said he was a racist. Lots of good people are called racists. Some even are racist. Why is it ok for some people to call other people racist and but not others? I'm not really agreeing with him I just didn't think it was a big deal at all. Hell I'd be more interested or riled up if he called him a liar or womanizer. We're all racist to some degree. We all see ethnicity and make pre-judgements and/or are predisposed to act in certain ways. It is human nature. I'd say it is the level and type of predisposition and pre-judgement that determines the perniciousness.

Oh I don't know, maybe the part where he says "this president has exposed himself as guy a who has deep seeded hatred of white people" and then says "I'm not saying he doesn't like white people," and finally says "this guy I believe is racist" all in the same interview? In light of the fact that the president is half white, employs white people one would thing the disagreeable part is obvious, especially for a critical thinker such as yourself. If it don't make a dolla it don't make sense, not that Beck makes sense but he sure does make a dolla.