![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Thats basically what it all comes down to and when you watch games like the one vs Denver and he is either missing or over throwing open wr's it makes you wonder if he can turn it on in a must score situation. This is the NFL, you arent going to have many blown coverages by the defense or 5yds of separation between your wr and the db on every play but when those scenerios do present themselves you must make those plays and from what we have seen i cant say id feel too confident in a 2 minute situation with JC under Center.
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
I'd say that's the single biggest reason that our offense is not converting in situations that it did last year: Campbell's missing open receivers too often.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
But i don't know about this one. I would put the onus on the OL and the suspect playcalling. I don't think JC misses any more then other QBs, but the other QBs have a greater margin for error because the have better overall teams. I've watched too many NFC east football games to say that JC misses more open receivers then Eli, Romo or McNabb. HTTR! I think we're gonna get a chance to make a good assessment of JC now that it appears the OL is coming together and there is competent playcalling (except when Zorn steals a call here and there). |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|