gardner haters

SkinsRock · 02-04-2005, 02:00 PM

We drafted two WR's in 2001...Gardner in the first, and McCants in the 5th. Ok, Gibbs obviously isn't crazy about McCants, and we agree that (unfortunately) he is most likely gone this year, but most would say (or have said) that McCants could fill Gardner's shoes in terms of his performance pretty easily. McCants has little to no trade value but Gardner could possibly get us as high as a 2nd (yeah right), but probably no lower than a 5th rounder. Plus he wants to leave!
You may ask why I'm comparing him to another WR that is practically gone...well it shows that as a former 1st round pick, he has underachieved, and a change is likely the best thing for both parties. I just hope the Skins are able to arrange a trade and don't end up having to just cut him.
As for Coles, at 80% he is still better than a lot of starting WR's IMO.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

02-04-2005, 02:00 PM	#19
SkinsRock Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Crofton, MD Age: 56 Posts: 907	We drafted two WR's in 2001...Gardner in the first, and McCants in the 5th. Ok, Gibbs obviously isn't crazy about McCants, and we agree that (unfortunately) he is most likely gone this year, but most would say (or have said) that McCants could fill Gardner's shoes in terms of his performance pretty easily. McCants has little to no trade value but Gardner could possibly get us as high as a 2nd (yeah right), but probably no lower than a 5th rounder. Plus he wants to leave! You may ask why I'm comparing him to another WR that is practically gone...well it shows that as a former 1st round pick, he has underachieved, and a change is likely the best thing for both parties. I just hope the Skins are able to arrange a trade and don't end up having to just cut him. As for Coles, at 80% he is still better than a lot of starting WR's IMO.

gardner haters

Locker Room Main Forum