RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms

SmootSmack · 12-15-2009, 12:09 AM

I wish we had kept Bridges myself, but the coaching staff felt guys like Batisted and Heyer had more long-term upside. Not a move I agree with. Bridges is a proven starting G/T. He's had more good games than bad in his career and more good than Heyer. N

FRPLG · 12-15-2009, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I wish we had kept Bridges myself, but the coaching staff felt guys like Batisted and Heyer had more long-term upside. Not a move I agree with. Bridges is a proven starting G/T. He's had more good games than bad in his career and more good than Heyer. N

With the state of our line the long-term upside decision was retarded. We didn't need long term upside. We neeed guys who play football now.

SmootSmack · 12-15-2009, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRPLG

With the state of our line the long-term upside decision was retarded. We didn't need long term upside. We neeed guys who play football now.

Well the upside for Batiste apparently wasn't that good. Redskins just cut him

12-15-2009, 12:09 AM	#1
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms I wish we had kept Bridges myself, but the coaching staff felt guys like Batisted and Heyer had more long-term upside. Not a move I agree with. Bridges is a proven starting G/T. He's had more good games than bad in his career and more good than Heyer. N __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

RI: Jeremy Bridges agrees to terms

Locker Room Main Forum