![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Impact Rookie
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: phoenix, az
Age: 47
Posts: 901
|
Re: What if Fred started 16 games?
Quote:
I love Cooley but i think part of this team's problems is we have a few fan favorites and it gets in the way of how we run our team. I like Cooley, and only mention the trade if we can get great value. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: What if Fred started 16 games?
Quote:
And prior to his injury this year he had 29 catches in 6 starts. That's nearly 5 per game, or a pretty healthy 80 catch season pace. Hey I'm all for looking into trade options too, I just think it's funny how all of a sudden Davis is everyone's hero and Cooley is on the back burner when really, there is no drastic difference in their level of production. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: What if Fred started 16 games?
Quote:
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,427
|
Re: What if Fred started 16 games?
Quote:
Davis is better trade bait IMO. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Age: 43
Posts: 3,238
|
Re: What if Fred started 16 games?
Quote:
__________________
"I don't think anybody should have regrets, especially me, ... You don't regret what you do in your life. If you do it, you do it for a reason." ST21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 348
|
Re: What if Fred started 16 games?
Has nothing to do with casting guys aside....its just good business.... if you can get value for 47 you take the picks. Better to have 1 great TE and one or two other potential starters, than 2 great TEs. Take the emotion of losing a fan favorite out of it and its a no brainer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: SF, Bay Area
Posts: 392
|
Re: What if Fred started 16 games?
This is heartbreaking for me. Cooley is my favorite player on the Skins, my heart is with Cooley, but my head is with Fred Davis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: What if Fred started 16 games?
Thing is it's not a popular thing to talk about 'round these parts. You know, lettin Cooley go and all. But I would have to think, at the very least, it's on the table. Fred Davis is going to be a stud; Stevie Wonder can see that. I think they roll with both guys next year and cut one of them loose the following year for sure. Tight ends just don't make or break your team.
Truth is unless your name is Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, or Drew Brees, no one is above being traded in the NFL. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mt. Laurel, NJ
Age: 38
Posts: 353
|
Re: What if Fred started 16 games?
Just out of curiosity how many people would trade Cooley for a 2nd (hopefully a 1st) round pick this offseason?
__________________
Hail Redskins!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: What if Fred started 16 games?
Quote:
no matter what happens, no matter how much Davis shines, I'd be sad about Cooley not being on our team.. but it comes down to a lot more than favoritism in this league and the teams that are in it year and and year out show that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: What if Fred started 16 games?
He's more athletic, he has just as good of hands if not better, and he'll break more tackles. However, Cooley is still the consummate Redskin and he's shown some good moves as well. Cooley right now has a very large contract but with a new coach that might not matter nearly as much. 2TE sets should be very interesting and what's to say we shouldn't put one in the slot every now and then? Or even come out of the backfield? Both of those guys can probably do either and to throw that mix up to the D that we're facing could be to an advantage; I don't see it happening but I could see it working.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,237
|
Re: What if Fred started 16 games?
Quote:
Doesn't Fred line up in the slot now?
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: What if Fred started 16 games?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 348
|
Re: What if Fred started 16 games?
Im a 47 and 86 fan...both are great TEs.... I do think we should trade Cooley for a pick or two, it just makes sense. No team is going to roll with two TE full time, thats just not realistic.
This conversation is another bi product of dumb ass Vinnie's stupidity. The skins didn't NEED Fred Davis!!!! Cooley is a top 10 TE, how many of us would love for the Davis pick to have been a RT? That being said.....86 > 47 in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: What if Fred started 16 games?
It surprises me that all of a sudden many think we should just trade CC. A guy that's proven, works hard, has a great attitude and has many attributes of a "true redskin." Fred Davis has overly impressed me this year and he's got a big time future too. I'm not ready to give up on CC and i too would be excited w/ both of them on the field.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|