Do You Want Jason Campbell Back in 2010?

[irish]

Originally Posted by Paintrain

Actually Garrard led the Jags to like an 11-5 record a couple of years back. Ok, so taking what you said about all of them being better than JC, with the same exact circumstances we faced this year but insert any of the other QB in there, how differently do you think our season would have turned out?

I think the Skins would have been at least an 8-8 team maybe 9-6. Teams know the Skins cant pass and that lets them be more aggressive on D since they know its very unlikely they will get burned for a big pass play.

[FRPLG]

Originally Posted by irish

I think the Skins would have been at least an 8-8 team maybe 9-6. Teams know the Skins cant pass and that lets them be more aggressive on D since they know its very unlikely they will get burned for a big pass play.

You're out of you damn mind if you think JC is so bad as to have lost us 4 games on his own.

[irish]

Originally Posted by FRPLG

You're out of you damn mind if you think JC is so bad as to have lost us 4 games on his own.

I didnt say JC lost 4 games on his own. I'm saying having a QB that provides the threat of a passing game allows the O the ability to do certain things that make the D have to plan for. Having that passing threat would IMO allow the Skins to score more points and that would change the complexion of the game (in other words, a ripple effect).

Its not as simple as 1 player winning or losing a game.