skins v chargers

CRedskinsRule · 01-03-2010, 08:34 PM

my understanding is that since we tied record-wise with cleveland, the positions rotate in the later rounds. so we would have the 4th and 37th and cleveland would have the 5th and 36th.

53Fan · 01-03-2010, 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

my understanding is that since we tied record-wise with cleveland, the positions rotate in the later rounds. so we would have the 4th and 37th and cleveland would have the 5th and 36th.

Not bad either way. We should be able to get a couple of young studs on the o-line. I mean.....Vinny's gone......right?

RMSkins · 01-03-2010, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

my understanding is that since we tied record-wise with cleveland, the positions rotate in the later rounds. so we would have the 4th and 37th and cleveland would have the 5th and 36th.

We didn't tie Cleveland record-wise. Cleveland finished 5-11 and we're 4-12.

Lotus · 01-03-2010, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

my understanding is that since we tied record-wise with cleveland, the positions rotate in the later rounds. so we would have the 4th and 37th and cleveland would have the 5th and 36th.

Substitute KC for Cleveland and you nailed it.

CRedskinsRule · 01-03-2010, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lotus

Substitute KC for Cleveland and you nailed it.

Thanks Lotus

I was going off of memory, and can't believe Cleveland had a better record than us

01-03-2010, 08:34 PM	#1
CRedskinsRule Living Legend Join Date: Aug 2008 Age: 59 Posts: 21,745	Re: skins v chargers my understanding is that since we tied record-wise with cleveland, the positions rotate in the later rounds. so we would have the 4th and 37th and cleveland would have the 5th and 36th.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

skins v chargers

Locker Room Main Forum