![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Kafka, Sheehan, Lefevour, Stull, Pike, Canfield, Max Hall from BYU, and Elliot from Purdue will be available in the 2nd to mid rounds. Lefevour will probably go by the 2nd. Same for Pike. I am thinking we can get Stull, Canfield, Hall, Sheehan, and the rest in round 3 or 4. I am partial to Big Ten or MAC QBs of course, being from the Great Lakes, but these guys are very good QBs surrounded with not the best talent(especially the MAC guys), but they make things happen. There really is a lot of good QBs available and I don't think Coach Shanny or MR Allen have to feel rushed about a QB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Gtripp,
What is your take on taking a second tier QB like Lefevour, Sheehan, Stull, Pike, Canfield, Kafka, etc? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Quote:
deep that you can probably get a second round value in the fourth round. All you're getting after the top ten picks is a system guy, so I don't see why we'd spend a pick at the top of the second on anyone but McCoy. However, as the draft gets deeper, I'd take pretty much any one of those players as a No. 2 QB who doesn't prevent us from drafting a No. 1 QB in 2011. I like the flexibility of that option.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Quote:
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Pent up frustration.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Yeah, I think we load up by taking a QB in 2010 and another in 2011 or 2012. Mallet of Arkansas, and Moore from Boise St are sophmores. Top juniors include Dalton of TCU, Keenum of Houston, and Enderle from Idaho. Todd Reesing is also a junior I believe. I like the second tiers because they are gunslingers working with less talent than these media created superstars that could be a just a good QB on a loaded team. McCoys' backup is heating things up now after a rather shaky start.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AFGHANISTAN
Posts: 335
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
the line needs to be young and drafted, we shouldnt be trying to patch it together like we always have. These guys need to be raised together and learn the scheme from day 1, not retraining them. GET OKUNG or Anthony Davis... BLING BLING!
__________________
Don't tase me bro!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
A lot of people here are quick to rip on QB prospects like Clausen ("southern california douche" "why wasn't the Irish in a Bowl game if he was so good?") and Bradford ("one hit to that shoulder and he's done" "all he do is throw out of the shotgun")...but why don't we give that same scrutiny to the offensive linemen? Just because we want to draft an offensive lineman so badly? Why is there no mention of Jason Fox's bad knee? Of Bruce Campbell's chronic turf toe and MCL sprain? Of Anthony Davis' multiple team violations? Of Bulaga's questionable pass blocking skills?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Well it's not like the only thing we need are linemen, and it's not like we're only allowed to make one move this off-season-1st round draft pick.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
I had to laugh when JC recently remarked with everything the team needs to fix all everyone still wants to talk about is him. So true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 48
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Boo-yah!
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 55
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
I am not saying I would take Bradford...but one of the best things about Shanahan is that he has always had good OL's without using high draft picks to build them for the most part. So I don't think it's LT or bust for the skins at #4.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|