![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 125
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Admittedly, I don't know a lot about draft strategy, but:
Do we go ahead and trade with K.C., allowing them to reunite Clausen with Weis? I don't know anything about the Chiefs. Are they committed to Matt Cassel? The Chiefs have a young, versatile O-lineman from Glen Burnie (former UVA guy Branden Albert). He's now starting at left tackle, but he lined up in college mostly at left guard. With the 5th pick we pick up Okung. We just bolstered the left side of the O-line by not picking up Clausen. Albert and Pick #5 (Okung) for the rights to Clausen. How realistic is this (again, I have no feel for trades)? Do we "shop" Jason Campbell around to make it look like we're going for Clausen? We get the O-line we need, K.C. gets a franchise QB who has demonstrated success under their new O-coordinator. Is this even in the realm of possibility? UPDATE: I just walked away from the computer, went to the bathroom, thought about it, and realized Weis and Matt Cassel have a pretty good working relationship, too. Oh well. Maybe this becomes a three-way trade with us getting Albert and Pick 5, KC getting Clausen (and maybe someone/something else from Team X), and Cassel going to Team X and team X getting something from Washington? Portis? So we get O-linemen and offload Portis (maybe picks from Team X). KC gets Clausen and something from, um, somebody. Team X gets Cassel and Portis. I could never be a GM. My head hurts. Last edited by Zorn on the 4th of July; 01-08-2010 at 12:35 AM. Reason: I'm an idiot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Quote:
1. St. Louis - Clausen 2. Detroit - Suh 3. TB - Berry 4. Skins - Okung
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 2
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
This to me sounds just about right! However after tonight's Alabama beat down of Texas and Ingram showing what type of RB he is it only makes it real difficult to pass a Heisman trophy winner and the Offensive player of a BCS Championship game. Don't get me wrong I love C.P. but his time is up. Gotta go young and gotta go strong! BTW hopefully now everyone can stop talking about Colt McCoy. Like he just said in his interview his arm feels dead. Can't take no risk. Also 2011 Draft we get Jake Locker at QB! We can't waste Draft picks this year!
__________________
H.T.T.R. All Day Every Day! Bleed, Sweat, Cry Burgundy! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 125
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Team X in my scenario: the Cleveland Browns, who badly need both Cassel and Portis.
Side note: Jahri Evans (Saints RG) should be our main target for free agency for the OL. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: 57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins
Quote:
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|