57 Mocks Munched! Suh Consensus No. 1, Bradford for Skins

[freddyg12]

Smoot mentioned McClain, LB from bama, the other day. I think Smoot, you said there was some early interest from the skins?

Regardless, just want to remind everyone that the 1st pick is likely not a debate simply of qb v. O line w/the new regime. I'm sure there are some defensive players that they like quite a bit. Seems this draft is tilted to defense in the top players.

If the 1st 3 picks are Clausen, Okung & Berry, I think Suh is too much to pass up. It is not all that unrealistic. That's kind of what I'm hoping for, and that we draft o line in the 2nd & get D. LeFevour in the 3rd via trade or 4th.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by freddyg12

Smoot mentioned McClain, LB from bama, the other day. I think Smoot, you said there was some early interest from the skins?

Regardless, just want to remind everyone that the 1st pick is likely not a debate simply of qb v. O line w/the new regime. I'm sure there are some defensive players that they like quite a bit. Seems this draft is tilted to defense in the top players.

If the 1st 3 picks are Clausen, Okung & Berry, I think Suh is too much to pass up. It is not all that unrealistic. That's kind of what I'm hoping for, and that we draft o line in the 2nd & get D. LeFevour in the 3rd via trade or 4th.

No, I just said he could be a sleeper pick. If I said there was interest from the Redskins I didn't mean to

[freddyg12]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

No, I just said he could be a sleeper pick. If I said there was interest from the Redskins I didn't mean to

I certainly wasn't quoting you, I just remembered you mentioned him.

Anyway, dude is a beast & I agree w/the sleeper call, especially if the 4-3 system is kept in place. In the pregame last night several teamates talked about how well he quarterbacks the D. Would be a good replacement of Fletcher. Not sure HB Blades is the long term answer at MLB.

[redsk1]

Originally Posted by freddyg12

I certainly wasn't quoting you, I just remembered you mentioned him.

Anyway, dude is a beast & I agree w/the sleeper call, especially if the 4-3 system is kept in place. In the pregame last night several teamates talked about how well he quarterbacks the D. Would be a good replacement of Fletcher. Not sure HB Blades is the long term answer at MLB.

That would most likely mean a trade down since McLain is not going 4th. You never know. I still think we're in a pretty good position to trade down w/ a team who falls in love w/ Bradford or Clausen.

St Louis...not sure they'll pass on Suh.

[Redpath]

Replace Fletcher? You serious?

[freddyg12]

Originally Posted by Redpath

Replace Fletcher? You serious?

Yes, he's probably got 1 decent year left. Even then, I would expect to see some drop off from him next season, he's played 12 years. I'm not saying cut him now, but they have to look towards replacing him, especially if the same system w/the Mike calling signals & in charge of the unit remains in place.

[freddyg12]

Originally Posted by redsk1

That would most likely mean a trade down since McLain is not going 4th. You never know. I still think we're in a pretty good position to trade down w/ a team who falls in love w/ Bradford or Clausen.

St Louis...not sure they'll pass on Suh.

At this point, but after the combine, interviews, workouts, etc. he may be considered worth the #4. If you want a LB to call signals & make plays, it's worth using a high pick IMO.