Global Warming? My A$$ Its Cold Outside

[dmek25]

he said he would vote no, which is his parties stance. did he give any reasons why?

[Trample the Elderly]

Originally Posted by dmek25

he said he would vote no, which is his parties stance. did he give any reasons why?

If someone offered you a shit sandwich, would you feel it necessary to give an explanation for declining?

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly

If someone offered you a shit sandwich, would you feel it necessary to give an explanation for declining?

Now that funny.

[Beemnseven]

Here's an article saying we're headed for a mini Ice Age...

The bitter winter afflicting much of the Northern Hemisphere is only the start of a global trend towards cooler weather that is likely to last for 20 or 30 years, say some of the world’s most eminent climate scientists.

Their predictions – based on an analysis of natural cycles in water temperatures in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans – challenge some of the global warming orthodoxy’s most deeply cherished beliefs, such as the claim that the North Pole will be free of ice in summer by 2013.

According to the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre in Colorado, Arctic summer sea ice has increased by 409,000 square miles, or 26 per cent, since 2007 – and even the most committed global warming activists do not dispute this.

[dmek25]

Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly

If someone offered you a shit sandwich, would you feel it necessary to give an explanation for declining?

if it was part of my job, then yes, i would explain. he gets paid to explain his stance on the issues

[Trample the Elderly]

Originally Posted by dmek25

if it was part of my job, then yes, i would explain. he gets paid to explain his stance on the issues

Well it would seem all of those voters disagree with you. Oh well?! I'm just saying?

[dmek25]

Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly

Well it would seem all of those voters disagree with you. Oh well?! I'm just saying?

what are you talking about? im saying he didnt explain his stance. are you saying he is just listening to the people?

[Trample the Elderly]

Originally Posted by dmek25

what are you talking about? im saying he didnt explain his stance. are you saying he is just listening to the people?

Imagine that?

He said his vote would be against Obama Care. That's pretty simple. The voters don't want it. They're already fed up with Romney Care, or so I've been told.

[wolfeskins]

Originally Posted by dmek25

if it was part of my job, then yes, i would explain. he gets paid to explain his stance on the issues

has he been asked,if so, did he dodge the question?

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by dmek25

if it was part of my job, then yes, i would explain. he gets paid to explain his stance on the issues

No, our representatives get paid to REPRESENT our stances. In MOST cases, representatives should vote the way their constituents tell them to. Unless there is something completely hidden from public record (which there shouldn't be) and they need to vote against the peoples' will because of the knowledge of that, they need to listen to us. If they do vote against our intentions, yeah, they BETTER have a good explanation.

Considering how many Americans are against the ObamaCare plan, we can see that a lot of Senators ignored the public's will when it passes in the Senate.

Massachusetts was a backlash and not-so-friendly reminder that they are employed BY US to do what WE tell them to.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by dmek25

he said he would vote no, which is his parties stance. did he give any reasons why?

Yea, because he saw how bad the health bill has been for Mass. that he voted for.