Landry for Rhodes?

[saden1]

Ah, no. Let's see, LL is 2 years younger, faster, and can be trained to do better than he has last year. Sorry, I would rather keep a fixable LL than trade him.

[Redskin Warrior]

Originally Posted by saden1

Ah, no. Let's see, LL is 2 years younger, faster, and can be trained to do better than he has last year. Sorry, I would rather keep a fixable LL than trade him.

I agree despite his problems they are fixable.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by saden1

Ah, no. Let's see, LL is 2 years younger, faster, and can be trained to do better than he has last year. Sorry, I would rather keep a fixable LL than trade him.

It's not like we're old at the safety position though. Freakin Reed Doughty has tenure.

[BallzDeep]

Originally Posted by saden1

Ah, no. Let's see, LL is 2 years younger, faster, and can be trained to do better than he has last year. Sorry, I would rather keep a fixable LL than trade him.

I would do it on a new York minute, He may be younger but I saw Jason Witten leave Landry in the dust, so faster, I would disagree

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by BallzDeep

I would do it on a new York minute, He may be younger but I saw Jason Witten leave Landry in the dust, so faster, I would disagree

that has more to do with route running and playing coverage

[wolfeskins]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

that has more to do with route running and playing coverage

i agree. i'd like to see LL playing close to the line and blitzing more often.