ESPN: Clayton Expects Skins to Tender Campbell for a 1st and 3rd

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by D'BOYZ

who's going to pay a 1st and 3rd for campbell he wasn't even worht the 1st yo uused nthe first place... he's an ok QB could be good i na few years maybe i nthe right system but no way worth a 1st and 3rd right now.... maybe a 3rd only.

jesus christ my screen is half red from the underlines of your shitty spelling

I'm more offended that you have no clue how the tender system works though

[MTK]

Originally Posted by tryfuhl

jesus christ my screen is half red from the underlines of your shitty spelling

I'm more offended that you have no clue how the tender system works though

I'm actually amazed that so many don't seem to understand about the way the tenders work. This isn't anything new.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

I'm actually amazed that so many don't seem to understand about the way the tenders work. This isn't anything new.

I'm amazed that some people don't understand the concept of a restricted free agent, and that getting an RFA would typically consist of giving up a draft pick(s) in order to get them.

[D'BOYZ]

Originally Posted by tryfuhl

jesus christ my screen is half red from the underlines of your shitty spelling

I'm more offended that you have no clue how the tender system works though

OFFCOURSE I KNOW HOW A TENDER SYSTEM WORKS.... first he hasn't been placed a 1st & 3rd round tender so saying that there's no need for dan Snyder to give him that tender it's not out of the question.

First you have to decide 1 thing do you want him back or prefer to get something out of him, If you want to keep him how much is he worth in the aspect of what teams would be willing to give for him.

Putting a same pick tender which is the normal tender would give you guys a 1st round pick if a team would offer a contract you wouldn't want to match but in case nobody would want to sign him it would cost less to keep him than a 1st and 3rd round tender which is the highest.

I don't see a team paying a 1st round pick for campbell less a 1st and 3rd and if Dan wants to trade him it gives him less leverage if he puts a the highest tender because less people would knock on his door because of what he would like to trade for ( at least a 1st round in this case)..... putting a same pick tender which is the less value type of tender gives him two options keep him cheap or get value for him a 2nd or 3rd round pick in a trade.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by D'BOYZ

OFFCOURSE I KNOW HOW A TENDER SYSTEM WORKS.... first he hasn't been placed a 1st & 3rd round tender so saying that there's no need for dan Snyder to give him that tender it's not out of the question.

First you have to decide 1 thing do you want him back or prefer to get something out of him, If you want to keep him how much is he worth in the aspect of what teams would be willing to give for him.

Putting a same pick tender which is the normal tender would give you guys a 1st round pick if a team would offer a contract you wouldn't want to match but in case nobody would want to sign him it would cost less to keep him than a 1st and 3rd round tender which is the highest.

I don't see a team paying a 1st round pick for campbell less a 1st and 3rd and if Dan wants to trade him it gives him less leverage if he puts a the highest tender because less people would knock on his door because of what he would like to trade for ( at least a 1st round in this case)..... putting a same pick tender which is the less value type of tender gives him two options keep him cheap or get value for him a 2nd or 3rd round pick in a trade.

No.

The tender has virtually nothing to do with trade value. The Skins can tag Campbell with a first and third tender and then trade him for a Snickers bar if they like.

[Raw0114]

Originally Posted by Lotus

The Skins can tag Campbell with a first and third tender and then trade him for a Snickers bar if they like.

I hear Dan likes Snicker. Hungry why wait?

[MTK]

Originally Posted by D'BOYZ

OFFCOURSE I KNOW HOW A TENDER SYSTEM WORKS....

Is that your final answer?