|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
03-03-2010, 11:39 AM
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
2. No Lion! Detroit wants to deal
The Lions, who pick second in the first round, have their fingers crossed that the Rams don’t pick a quarterback so they can trade down with either Cleveland or Buffalo, who apparently are in the quarterback market. The thought process is that new Browns czar Mike Holmgren won’t want to lose his favorite quarterback to Washington and new coach Mike Shanahan. The Redskins are perched at No. 4, three spots ahead of the Browns. The Lions really don’t want to spend $33 million in bonus money on a defensive tackle. Source: Czar: Rumors heard 'round the NFL Combine - NFL News - FOX Sports on MSN
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
03-03-2010, 12:04 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Quote:
How early can a team trade picks? Meaning, can it be done prior to the draft? Why wouldn't they trade the pick with us? I can't imagine that we wouldn't take additional picks and they would save some cash. |
|
|
|
|
|
03-03-2010, 12:30 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-03-2010, 02:03 PM
|
#4 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Double Coverage: Bradford to the Rams? - NFC West Blog - ESPN
Very interesting debate concerning weather the Rams should draft Bradford or Suh. The reasoning behind drafting Suh states that Spags had a great line in NY and the Rams will most likely be picking in the top 5 again next year in what is projected to be a "stronger" QB class. Of course keep in mind things change. Last year at this time people were thinking that Bradford, McCoy, Snead, and Tebow could all be sure fire first rounders. If I remember right, it was possible that even Zac Robinson could become a first round pick. Now the only two guys that are going in the first are Bradford and Clausen. Heck even Chris Simms and Andrew Walter were predicted to be high first round picks in their respective drafts. Ciron Black was suppose to be our first round pick this year according to Todd McShay. Either way nice debate and reasoning for the Rams to take Suh which would give us a much better chance of getting Bradford :FIREdevil
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
03-03-2010, 03:28 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Schefter: "There's no way" the Rams won't pick Sam Bradford at No. 1
Quote:
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
