Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

[SirClintonPortis]

Hicks may not be that good, but Heyer is so bad that he may win out against Heyer.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis

Hicks may not be that good, but Heyer is so bad that he may win out against Heyer.

Which is the kind of dualism we have to stay far away from while we rebuild the offense.

This doesn't prevent us from adding better players, but the moves seem more designed to placate a fanbase than improve a team. Not that I'm against either signing in particular, it depends on how we progress with them.

[SirClintonPortis]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Which is the kind of dualism we have to stay far away from while we rebuild the offense.

This doesn't prevent us from adding better players, but the moves seem more designed to placate a fanbase than improve a team. Not that I'm against either signing in particular, it depends on how we progress with them.

They'll be gone in two years. Seriously, how is signing stopgap players who are basically nobodies placating the fans?

[Longtimefan]

Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis

Hicks may not be that good, but Heyer is so bad that he may win out against Heyer.

Hicks is a G. Heyer has never played at the G position. Hicks will be competition, something Shanahan wants at all positions.