![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Your opinion of the Redskins new approach to free agency? | |||
| Thumbs up |
|
99 | 92.52% |
| Thumbs down |
|
8 | 7.48% |
| Voters: 107. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC
Age: 61
Posts: 104
|
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?
If there were anybody at a position of need available that didn't get wildly over paid I'd be concerned but that isn't the case. I love the fact that this front office has decided not to sign FA's just for the sake of making a splash or to appease a ridiculously impatient owner or fan-base.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?
The FA pool this year was crap. Only a few difference makers and not at positions where we really had needs. Why accumulate more of what we had just cut? A bunch of average players that we'd be kicking ourselves over in a few seasons after 8-9 games a year with them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?
Let's also not forget that danny et al weren't big spenders in free agency every year as it seems now most people are presuming. Look back at each year & you'll see highs & lows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?
Its been a letdown to me for the lack of action by the FO thus far. I expected to wake up and see a few moves done on the first day.
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 61
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?
It's about time that we build the team patiently for the long haul, emphasizing the draft and making opportunistic signings like Hicks. I have vastly more patience with a FO that builds this way than with Snyderato trying to buy the trophy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?
Yea, we've generally been pretty damn aggressive in FA. We won 4 games last year. We've got a ton of holes on an aging team. We've cut 10+ players. It's time to do a little rebuilding here. It's not a time to shill out a ton of $ on players who will most likely be old in a few years when we need them to be in their prime.
The Skins aren't going to be "fixed" overnight. So gun shy, no. It actually feels like they have a plan as opposed to previous years. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?
I have to admit, I was the biggest whiner that we weren't spending money, but maybe it was someone on NFLN who laid it out nicely for me.
Sure, I'm sitting here thinking, "Wow, the one year we CAN spend money, we're not doing it." A total paradigm shift obviously, but now after hearing their explanation, I'm totally convinced what they're doing now is a great idea. Sure, there's no cap this year, but what about next year for the people who have giant contracts they took on this year. Who are they going to be able to sign? We're setting ourselves up for a serious, thought-out rebuild, so I'm absolutely changing my opinion on the front office thus far this offseason.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?
While I am not completely pleased with the moves and non-moves the Redskins have made so far, I think that Shanahan and Allen are working toward a larger purpose. They are changing the culture and reputation of the Washington Redskins. This is no longer a place for guys to come who "want to get paid." We will not overspend for anyone. Lets take Clifton for example. We need a LT BADLY and Clifton would have been a nice stop-gap. Yes we could have had him on a 3year contract and could have cut him in 2011 with little to no cap penalty if the cap returns. Even though there would be no negative consequences for overspending on Clifton, we were determined not to do it. Not signing him may hurt us in 2010. However, not signing him (or Peppers, Dansby, etc. for that matter) sends a message to players that things have changed and that we don't want players here who just want to get their big payday. In the short-term, this strategy is hurting the team. However, in the long-term, this will help change the character and makeup of the team for the better.
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Silver Spring, Md
Posts: 69
|
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?
I am just so shocked to hear that Redskins fans are complaining of how the team is dealing with free agency. Over the past 5 years the team has been trigger happy and the team has become the offseason champs. Finally, management is actually viewing our current roster and making great money decisions. Everyone Jumps. Relax, we have great minds in office and dont be surprised when 3 big moves happen within the next 4 weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?
What, are we 5 days into FA now?
We've taken out the trash (no disrespect to the individual players) and already added a versatile OFFENSIVE LINEMAN. We're doing fine. Plenty of time to make moves. The FA pool will continue to grow, not shrink. As long as we have the line covered in the draft, I'm happy with the job they've done.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
|
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?
Levi is a UFA
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Silver Spring, Md
Posts: 69
|
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?
My big prediction is that Redskins acquire brandon marshall, by trading the 4 spot for a later 1st round draft pick. LT will join portis in the backfield allowing us to draft a 4th round running back. Believe me this is not a fantasy trade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?
Why on earth would Shanny trade for Brandon Marshall, a player that he previously wanted to ditch?
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 46
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?
Quote:
Neither will happen. LT has a better chance here than Marshall, but I don't think he'd accept a backup role on a noncontender.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
|
Re: Is the new Redskins Front Office Gun Shy?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|