2010 NFL Off-Season Rumors and Reports (Week 3)

[wolfeskins]

i gotta give some credit to the new men in town (shanny and bruce) seems to me like they want to sign players that are hungry and just want to play some football. no longer is washington the destination of a player who is going from team to team just looking for the highest contract.

[Longtimefan]

Originally Posted by wolfeskins

i gotta give some credit to the new men in town (shanny and bruce) seems to me like they want to sign players that are hungry and just want to play some football. no longer is washington the destination of a player who is going from team to team just looking for the highest contract.

Unfortunately, that's what free-agency has done to the game of football. Rent a player has spiralled out of control, and it's definitely a good thing to see the Reskins exercising good judgement.

[SFREDSKIN]

It has been fairly quiet during the FA period but I got a feeling that it will be pretty active during the draft with some trades. I expect Carter, Landry and possibly Moss saying goodbye. I would love to get Golden Tate somehow.

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

It has been fairly quiet during the FA period but I got a feeling that it will be pretty active during the draft with some trades. I expect Carter, Landry and possibly Moss saying goodbye. I would love to get Golden Tate somehow.

We aren't replacing Moss and Landry with 3rd and 4th round players.

If we get rid of Carter, Landry and Moss we are throwing away 2010. I don't know about you but I would be pretty pissed about that. I am sure that Haynesworth wouldn't be too happy either.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

We aren't replacing Moss and Landry with 3rd and 4th round players.

If we get rid of Carter, Landry and Moss we are throwing away 2010. I don't know about you but I would be pretty pissed about that. I am sure that Haynesworth wouldn't be too happy either.

Read this carefully:

I think it would make sense if we trade down out of the 4th spot, pick up another high pick, trade Landry for hopefully a 3rd or better, then draft Berry or Mays (whoever is available) then with the 2nd rounder pick an OT and with the pick added from the trade whether it is a 2nd or 3rd rounder get an OG, plus we get the Landry pick for either a LB, QB or RB. I would also try to trade Carter.

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Read this carefully:

I think it would make sense if we trade down out of the 4th spot, pick up another high pick, trade Landry for hopefully a 3rd or better, then draft Berry or Mays (whoever is available) then with the 2nd rounder pick an OT and with the pick added from the trade whether it is a 2nd or 3rd rounder get an OG, plus we get the Landry pick for either a LB, QB or RB. I would also try to trade Carter.

For your benefit, I don't need to be told to read something carefully and putting the entire post in bold doesn't make a difference to me.

Everyone in the top 5 wants to trade down (for several reasons), in the current environment it is very unlikely, so considering the scenario is most likely a waste of time.

We can disagree but trading Landry for a 3rd hurts the team and I don't see it happening. If we trade down, we aren't getting Berry. Mays, sure, but he isn't making it to the pick we would get for Landry so that is a net negative.

I don't think it makes any sense to trade Landry for a 3rd and pick a safety with our first pick. It just doesn't. Now if you keep Landry and pick Berry, I can live with that. It isn't what I want but Berry is an animal and if he is there at 4 he is arguably the most talented player on the board.

Tackle with the 2nd, ok. I would rather use the 1st on a tackle but that is fine.

Picking a guard with the aquired 3rd, ok. I don't think you can count on him to play in year one (see Chad Rinehart) but I want us to start taking the shotgun approach to drafting O-lineman.

I am fine with trading Carter. I think SmootSmack said we could get a 4th, maybe?