At what point would you Trade Up to get Jimmy Clausen?

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by SBXVII

Rumors I've heard were exactly that....

They were looking to trade out of the #1 spot cause they didn't want to have to pay a Rookie that kind of money.

They didn't want to too far down the draft where they couldn't get the guy they were interested in.

On top of that there is the rumor that Spags was almost let go cause the owners were not happy with last year but were talked into giving him one more year. Because of this I heard Spags may not want to put all his cards on an unproven rookie QB cause it might just be his job.

I know what they say about rumors but if any of this is anywhere near the truth I can see us making a decent trade. They get the QB spot settled with a decent QB who is safe with the ball. They get a decent DE which they need and Carter still has gas left but might not fit in a 3-4 for us. Plus they get the #4 pick to take whoever they want...Tackle or DL.

You didn't answer the question though. Why would you want to trade up to No. 1 for a guy who would, in your hypothetical, be available at No. 4?

Pure and simple, if you're trying to buy Bradford from the Rams, it's going to cost you a Jay Cutler type package. Next year's first and probably third, as well as this year's fourth and the fourth overall pick. That's a lot different from Campbell and Carter, two players who don't have long term value to us. You're going from giving up about three marginal wins in players, 2 of which come from Campbell this season (projected...by me, sorry) to giving up multiple first round picks and future considerations. And you get...well, Sam Bradford.

Or, if the Rams were going to pass on him, you just take him at No. 4 for no additional cost.

[skinsnut]

I would NOT trade UP to get Jimmy Clausen.
Retarded question.

[over the mountain]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

You didn't answer the question though. Why would you want to trade up to No. 1 for a guy who would, in your hypothetical, be available at No. 4?

Pure and simple, if you're trying to buy Bradford from the Rams, it's going to cost you a Jay Cutler type package. Next year's first and probably third, as well as this year's fourth and the fourth overall pick. That's a lot different from Campbell and Carter, two players who don't have long term value to us. You're going from giving up about three marginal wins in players, 2 of which come from Campbell this season (projected...by me, sorry) to giving up multiple first round picks and future considerations. And you get...well, Sam Bradford.

Or, if the Rams were going to pass on him, you just take him at No. 4 for no additional cost.

i think you greatly greatly overexagerating if you think it will take:

skins 4th overall + 4th rounder + 2011 1st rounder + 3rd rounder just to move up 3 spots to no. 1.

do you seriously think it would take all that to move up 3 spots? thats seems absurd. (dikta doesnt count).

if they like him, we will draft him at 4. if they dont, we wont.

[Slingin Sammy 33]

Originally Posted by over the mountain

i think you greatly greatly overexagerating if you think it will take:

skins 4th overall + 4th rounder + 2011 1st rounder + 3rd rounder just to move up 3 spots to no. 1.

do you seriously think it would take all that to move up 3 spots? thats seems absurd. (dikta doesnt count).

if they like him, we will draft him at 4. if they dont, we wont.

I think GTripp is basing his assumption on the draft value chart. Using that, he's about right on what it would take to move up to #1. The pick value for #1 overall is 3000, the picks GTripp mentioned come out to about 3150 (estimating the Skins to be at about pick 15 in 2011).

But to your point, no way I move up to get Bradford. I wouldn't take him at #4 either (it's pretty well documented who I'd take )

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by Slingin Sammy 33

I think GTripp is basing his assumption on the draft value chart. Using that, he's about right on what it would take to move up to #1. The pick value for #1 overall is 3000, the picks GTripp mentioned come out to about 3150 (estimating the Skins to be at about pick 15 in 2011).

But to your point, no way I move up to get Bradford. I wouldn't take him at #4 either (it's pretty well documented who I'd take )

The guy looking for his baseball in "There's something about Mary" wouldn't sign off on that trade.

[MonkFan4Life]

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

The guy looking for his baseball in "There's something about Mary" wouldn't sign off on that trade.

WHO WARREN !?!?!?!?!?

HA !

That movie is so hilarious !

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

You didn't answer the question though. Why would you want to trade up to No. 1 for a guy who would, in your hypothetical, be available at No. 4?

Pure and simple, if you're trying to buy Bradford from the Rams, it's going to cost you a Jay Cutler type package. Next year's first and probably third, as well as this year's fourth and the fourth overall pick. That's a lot different from Campbell and Carter, two players who don't have long term value to us. You're going from giving up about three marginal wins in players, 2 of which come from Campbell this season (projected...by me, sorry) to giving up multiple first round picks and future considerations. And you get...well, Sam Bradford.

Or, if the Rams were going to pass on him, you just take him at No. 4 for no additional cost.

Huh? "Cocaine is a powerful drug..."