Brandon or T.O. ?

TheSmurfs22 · 03-26-2010, 04:57 PM

Both of these guys are viruses.

BlindReckoning · 03-26-2010, 05:04 PM

This doesn't even depend on if it was Shanahan we were actually dealing with all those times they got over on us in trades. Denver thinks all their players are gold. We don't really need receivers atm and if we did I wouldn't get one from Denver. I thought Shanny was going to even cut Marshal at one point when he was there. If you got to have a receiver get Owens with and incentive based front loaded contract. But again why.....we got three good possibilities. I'm really waiting to see Marko in some games.

Ruhskins · 03-26-2010, 05:05 PM

The way Bruce Allen has been negotiating these contracts, I wouldn't be surprised that if (we were to) get TO, it'd be for a base salary of 10K or something ridiculously cheap.

Dirtbag59 · 03-26-2010, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

The way Bruce Allen has been negotiating these contracts, I wouldn't be surprised that if (we were to) get TO, it'd be for a base salary of 10K or something ridiculously cheap.

With crazy incentives. Don't say anything remotely critical of the QB, coaches, or any other teammmates unless told otherwise $1 million.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 53Fan

I would rather not sign either. After all the crap I've given Cowgirl fans about T.O. uhhh.....no thank you.

Yeah, but now he would be our crap.

53Fan · 03-26-2010, 09:41 PM

I would rather not sign either. After all the crap I've given Cowgirl fans about T.O. uhhh.....no thank you.

53Fan · 03-26-2010, 10:13 PM

^ Crap is the key word Dirtbag. Once he starts dropping passes all hell would break loose around here. Besides, I don't want him taking time away from our young guys. But that's just me.

Pocket$ $traight · 03-26-2010, 10:24 PM

I want both. I am tired of this b.s. waiting game! We haven't pissed away a pick for a big name yet. We dumped a bunch of overpriced veterans. We made saavy cap moves and we let people come here and leave town.

UNACCEPTABLE!!!!

53Fan · 03-26-2010, 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

I want both. I am tired of this b.s. waiting game! We haven't pissed away a pick for a big name yet. We dumped a bunch of overpriced veterans. We made saavy cap moves and we let people come here and leave town.

UNACCEPTABLE!!!!

We could always sign Jason Taylor again!

Pocket$ $traight · 03-26-2010, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 53Fan

We could always sign Jason Taylor again!

I am not for that at all, but he would be a better fit with the current regime!

Does anyone know someone who bought that jersey?

53Fan · 03-26-2010, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

I am not for that at all, but he would be a better fit with the current regime!

Does anyone know someone who bought that jersey?

Man they use to have it in every department store around here...cheap! And no, I don't know anyone who owns one.

Pocket$ $traight · 03-26-2010, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 53Fan

We could always sign Jason Taylor again!

It is interesting that two exceptional D-lineman were given to Blache and he ruined both in consecutive years.

53Fan · 03-26-2010, 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

It is interesting that two exceptional D-lineman were given to Blache and he ruined both in consecutive years.

If you show pass rushing skills, you're immediately in his doghouse. I'm pretty stoked about seeing the defense cut loose this year.

skinsnut · 03-26-2010, 11:14 PM

T.O. will always be a Cowgirl to me, reminds me of Michael Irvin...I can't stand the guy....every time we touch that teams' players we get hexed.
It's really simple....stay away from anyone ever associated to the Cowboys....PERIOD...they are the ENEMY.

Brandon Marshall is fine, but trading anything for him is NOT.
If we trade for someone, it should be for a starting LT.
That is all I have to say about that.

tootergray34 · 03-26-2010, 11:01 PM

Marshall in a heartbeat...gotta be like 10 years younger!

#56fanatic · 03-27-2010, 08:33 AM

neither...and here is why

1) both are head cases...primadonnas (sp)
2) why not develop our own receivers?
3) TO is way past being dominant...and would completely destroy which ever QB we have playing
4) Marshal is OK when winning, but his true colors really come out when they lose or are struggling, or when he doesn't feel involved, just as TO does.

This is just not something we need to do. To get Marshall we will have to part with Malcomb Kelly probably and our 2nd rounder. We NEED our 2nd rounder more than we need Brandon Marshall. I dont disagree, he is a really good receiver, but honestly how many headcases do we need in the locker room. I dont want to turn into one of those teams. Haynesworth is a 350 pound headcase, that a big enough problem as it is.

03-26-2010, 04:57 PM	#1
TheSmurfs22 The Starter Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Staunton, VA Posts: 1,261	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? Both of these guys are viruses. __________________ F#$% the Cowpukes!

03-26-2010, 05:04 PM	#2
BlindReckoning Camp Scrub Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 36	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? This doesn't even depend on if it was Shanahan we were actually dealing with all those times they got over on us in trades. Denver thinks all their players are gold. We don't really need receivers atm and if we did I wouldn't get one from Denver. I thought Shanny was going to even cut Marshal at one point when he was there. If you got to have a receiver get Owens with and incentive based front loaded contract. But again why.....we got three good possibilities. I'm really waiting to see Marko in some games.

03-26-2010, 05:05 PM	#3
Ruhskins Living Legend Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 22,379	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? The way Bruce Allen has been negotiating these contracts, I wouldn't be surprised that if (we were to) get TO, it'd be for a base salary of 10K or something ridiculously cheap. __________________ R.I.P. #21

03-26-2010, 10:13 PM	#6
53Fan Franchise Player Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C. Posts: 7,570	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? ^ Crap is the key word Dirtbag. Once he starts dropping passes all hell would break loose around here. Besides, I don't want him taking time away from our young guys. But that's just me. __________________ Defense wins championships. Bring it!

03-26-2010, 10:24 PM	#7
Pocket$ $traight Registered User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 50 Posts: 4,261	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? I want both. I am tired of this b.s. waiting game! We haven't pissed away a pick for a big name yet. We dumped a bunch of overpriced veterans. We made saavy cap moves and we let people come here and leave town. UNACCEPTABLE!!!!

03-26-2010, 09:41 PM	#5
53Fan Franchise Player Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C. Posts: 7,570	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? I would rather not sign either. After all the crap I've given Cowgirl fans about T.O. uhhh.....no thank you. __________________ Defense wins championships. Bring it!

03-26-2010, 11:14 PM	#13
skinsnut Playmaker Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 3,066	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? T.O. will always be a Cowgirl to me, reminds me of Michael Irvin...I can't stand the guy....every time we touch that teams' players we get hexed. It's really simple....stay away from anyone ever associated to the Cowboys....PERIOD...they are the ENEMY. Brandon Marshall is fine, but trading anything for him is NOT. If we trade for someone, it should be for a starting LT. That is all I have to say about that. __________________ I hate Dallas...Period

03-26-2010, 11:01 PM	#14
tootergray34 Impact Rookie Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Charleston, SC Posts: 681	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? Marshall in a heartbeat...gotta be like 10 years younger!

03-27-2010, 08:33 AM	#15
#56fanatic The Starter Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Charlotte NC Age: 51 Posts: 1,801	Re: Brandon or T.O. ? neither...and here is why 1) both are head cases...primadonnas (sp) 2) why not develop our own receivers? 3) TO is way past being dominant...and would completely destroy which ever QB we have playing 4) Marshal is OK when winning, but his true colors really come out when they lose or are struggling, or when he doesn't feel involved, just as TO does. This is just not something we need to do. To get Marshall we will have to part with Malcomb Kelly probably and our 2nd rounder. We NEED our 2nd rounder more than we need Brandon Marshall. I dont disagree, he is a really good receiver, but honestly how many headcases do we need in the locker room. I dont want to turn into one of those teams. Haynesworth is a 350 pound headcase, that a big enough problem as it is.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Brandon or T.O. ?

Locker Room Main Forum