Mcnabb to Washington?

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by NM Redskin

Mcnabb has never been a difference maker? You had me until point 2, I think you missed the boat on that one.

What differences would you change that are attributable to something McNabb did?

[skinsguy]

McNabb is definitely a top notch QB, but I don't think you give up a second rounder for him at this point in his career. It would be the same difference as where we were with Mark Brunell a couple of years ago. And while I was a Brunell apologist, I feel Campbell and maybe even...*gulp* Grossman (can't believe I just said that but anyways) are both good enough stop gaps to lead this team until we can draft a top notch QB, either in this draft of next season. This team is trying to get younger, not older. While McNabb probably could come in and make the 'skins an immediate playoff contender, how much of the future are you giving up for him? And how long, realistically is he going to play for us?

I say we keep focused on rebuilding the offensive and defensive lines, our offensive backfield (which looks like we've done a good job with that) and our defensive secondary. No denying we need a top notch QB, but I just don't believe a deal with McNabb is the way to go.

With that said, look for the McNabb to be signed by five o'clock tomorrow evening..lol!

[NM Redskin]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

What differences would you change that are attributable to something McNabb did?

4th and 26 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by NM Redskin

4th and 26 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Well, Freddie Mitchell is available, I hear. And he wouldn't cost as much as McNabb, presumably.

I think the Packers DC (Donahue) who called that defense is equally available, not coincidentally.