Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


McNabb a REDSKIN!

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Donovan McNabb is now a Redskin, do you approve?
Yes 65 72.22%
No 25 27.78%
Voters: 90. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-05-2010, 12:23 AM   #1
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: McNabb a REDSKIN!

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
Incorrect. There is no no-trade clause.
Perhaps I'm wrong but McNabb had a "no trade" clause with the Eagles. We traded with the Eagles, because McNabb allowed the trade, which means we have essentally picked up the "no trade" contract McNabb had. Unless he signes an extension or a new deal.

Correct?
SBXVII is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 12:25 AM   #2
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
Re: McNabb a REDSKIN!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
Perhaps I'm wrong but McNabb had a "no trade" clause with the Eagles. We traded with the Eagles, because McNabb allowed the trade, which means we have essentally picked up the "no trade" contract McNabb had. Unless he signes an extension or a new deal.

Correct?
I thought that they said he actually didn't have that clause? And if so it probably wouldn't be transferable, but it'd depend on the writing
tryfuhl is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 12:28 AM   #3
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: McNabb a REDSKIN!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
Perhaps I'm wrong but McNabb had a "no trade" clause with the Eagles. We traded with the Eagles, because McNabb allowed the trade, which means we have essentally picked up the "no trade" contract McNabb had. Unless he signes an extension or a new deal.

Correct?
All I know is I just heard Schefter say that McNabb doesn't have a "no trade" option with the Redskins.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 12:33 AM   #4
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: McNabb a REDSKIN!

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
All I know is I just heard Schefter say that McNabb doesn't have a "no trade" option with the Redskins.
He definitly had one with the Eagles. He basically said he'd work with them if they traded him to a team he liked. If they wouldn't he would invoke the clause.

I would presume that when he agreed to the trade his contract came with him until we either extend him or resign him. He has like one year left I think.

I just don't see how by this trade taking place a part of McNabbs contract is now null and void? We basically picked up his whole contract until he has a redo on his contract.
SBXVII is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 12:38 AM   #5
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
Re: McNabb a REDSKIN!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
He definitly had one with the Eagles. He basically said he'd work with them if they traded him to a team he liked. If they wouldn't he would invoke the clause.

I would presume that when he agreed to the trade his contract came with him until we either extend him or resign him. He has like one year left I think.

I just don't see how by this trade taking place a part of McNabbs contract is now null and void? We basically picked up his whole contract until he has a redo on his contract.
There was no no-trade clause, just something that said he could refuse to negotiate an extension or something. In effect it allowed him to choose where he went.
tryfuhl is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 12:40 AM   #6
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
Re: McNabb a REDSKIN!

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
There was no no-trade clause, just something that said he could refuse to negotiate an extension or something. In effect it allowed him to choose where he went.
Exactly. Basically his version of a no-trade clause as I've said before was hoping to scare teams that he didn't like off enough to discourage them from trading for him.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline  
Old 04-05-2010, 12:45 AM   #7
Gtothearry
The Starter
 
Gtothearry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
Re: McNabb a REDSKIN!

"Reid said the possibility McNabb could refuse to go to another team or decline to extend his contract was not a factor"

What else would Reid say? Obviously the Eagles wouldn't trade Mcnabb to a division rival without being forced to do so.
Gtothearry is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.59113 seconds with 12 queries