Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Can Colt Brennan beat Rex Grossman for number 2 spot

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-06-2010, 03:36 PM   #1
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Can Colt Brennan beat Rex Grossman for number 2 spot

Colt is a poor man's Rex Grossman.

Rex is already familiar with this offense too.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 03:48 PM   #2
JLW428
Special Teams
 
JLW428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 422
Re: Can Colt Brennan beat Rex Grossman for number 2 spot

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Colt is a poor man's Rex Grossman.

Rex is already familiar with this offense too.
Yeah, I really don't see Colt here much longer...
__________________
"The more physical the play, the better Ovechkin is - and you'd be wise not to start pushing and shoving with Alex Ovechkin" - The Locker
JLW428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2010, 04:10 PM   #3
cdskins26
Special Teams
 
cdskins26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 351
Re: Can Colt Brennan beat Rex Grossman for number 2 spot

Quote:
Originally Posted by JLW428 View Post
Yeah, I really don't see Colt here much longer...
Agreed. We need a new long term project at QB.
cdskins26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.67510 seconds with 11 queries