New possible trade/draft scenarios

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

If they dump Godzilla, it is because he pissed Shanny off with the workout "talk" and the Mastermind has chosen to make an example of him, it wasn't because of production.

I just hope that they can work this out. I really think that this guy makes our team better. A lot better than the 2nd 3rd or 4th round pick that we would get for him.

Everyone seems to forget that apparently Shanny was dangling Landry as a trade bait. It seems that the media finds it easier to target Haynesworth.

[SFREDSKIN]

One thing is for sure with this new regime, if it's a rumor, then it means it's true. I wouldn't be surprised to see Landry, Haynesworth, Carter, Rogers, campbell all gone.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

One thing is for sure with this new regime, if it's a rumor, then it means it's true. I wouldn't be surprised to see Landry, Haynesworth, Carter, Rogers, campbell all gone.

Agreed. I feel that Shanahan and Allen are being all business about this and are willing to part ways (for compensation) with any player from the previous regime they deem expendable. Personally, I don't feel our FO would get rid of a player for the petty excuse that they didn't show up to "voluntary" workouts or any crap like that. The more reason why I find this whole Haynesworth "drama" to be ridiculous.

[SFREDSKIN]

You might as well say goodbye to Haynesworth washingtonpost.com. The only salvation would be Suh as a replacement for him.

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

You might as well say goodbye to Haynesworth washingtonpost.com. The only salvation would be Suh as a replacement for him.

If you are right then not only is he costing us 40 million for 1 year but the #4 pick as well (for a replacement).

That seems like an overreaction to me. Can we not just coach him up?

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

If you are right then not only is he costing us 40 million for 1 year but the #4 pick as well (for a replacement).

That seems like an overreaction to me. Can we not just coach him up?

Only if AH is willing to go along Shanahan and Haslett's plans, if not he's a much more expensive Jason Taylor.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Only if AH is willing to go along Shanahan and Haslett's plans, if not he's a much more expensive Jason Taylor.

Which he has said so in public. And honestly, I think Haynesworth is right and he should be played as a DE. Not because of some pettiness or because he's being a diva or whatever, but because it makes football sense. I would hope that the days of fitting square pegs into round holes are gone in this team.

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Only if AH is willing to go along Shanahan and Haslett's plans, if not he's a much more expensive Jason Taylor.

he said he'll do what's asked but also told them how he'd be contribute

kind of the same thing he did last year.. he played even though it wasn't utilizing him to the best of his ability

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

If you are right then not only is he costing us 40 million for 1 year but the #4 pick as well (for a replacement).

That seems like an overreaction to me. Can we not just coach him up?

I doubt Haynesworth would be traded, unless a good offer comes along. Which I think holds true for Landry, maybe Rogers, and maybe Carter.

I feel that just about every single move that our new FO has made, has been all business and pretty logical. And I'm sure a trade for any of these guys, would be because of a good offer and not some petty crap like he didn't show up for workouts.

And if we traded, I would just see spending 40 mil of Snyder's money for some picks.

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

I doubt Haynesworth would be traded, unless a good offer comes along. Which I think holds true for Landry, maybe Rogers, and maybe Carter.

I feel that just about every single move that our new FO has made, has been all business and pretty logical. And I'm sure a trade for any of these guys, would be because of a good offer and not some petty crap like he didn't show up for workouts.

And if we traded, I would just see spending 40 mil of Snyder's money for some picks.

I guess that is one way to look at it. I see letting the most destructive lineman in the league walk away because both sides are too stubborn to compromise.

What if Suh or McCoy are just another Glenn Dorsey?

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

You might as well say goodbye to Haynesworth washingtonpost.com. The only salvation would be Suh as a replacement for him.

yeah we've been discussing that

I think Sellers said that Haynesworth was the only one not there

I understand Shanahan has no loyalty to Haynesworth but at the same time you better get a baller deal to ship away someone of his caliber.. he talks about using players to their potential, there's your guy

we'll see

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Everyone seems to forget that apparently Shanny was dangling Landry as a trade bait. It seems that the media finds it easier to target Haynesworth.

Well Haynesworth does make for a bigger story/bigger fail. They just paid the guy 21 million about a week ago... Which makes me think they offered him to Philly before he was paid.

I like Landry a lot (at least a lot more than most people around here) but I can't say that I would have been too upset with a Landry/McNabb deal straight up.

[warpaint]

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

Well Haynesworth does make for a bigger story/bigger fail. They just paid the guy 21 million about a week ago... Which makes me think they offered him to Philly before he was paid.

I like Landry a lot (at least a lot more than most people around here) but I can't say that I would have been too upset with a Landry/McNabb deal straight up.

I doubt we will try a trade that wouldn't give our money back. AH was solid last year hopefully this puts a chip on his shoulder. Shanahan knows how to motivate and this could be a great motivating tool.