Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

Is Al that big of a distraction to the team? They would have to despise him to go through with that because that is a lot of trouble to, most likely, downgrade at DT. It isn't a cost cutting move because the 4th pick is going to be making huge guaranteed money. To me, that would be a waste of our 4th pick because you have to commit that pick to get anywhere near the production that you are shipping out.

Granted, you will get some type of pick or two for the big guy but this is a lot of effort to take a step back.

Throughout this entire thread, i've made it clear that his being "a distraction" has little - if anything - to do with us wanting to move him. our desire to move him is atleast 99% about acquiring offensive talent.

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat

Throughout this entire thread, i've made it clear that his being "a distraction" has little - if anything - to do with us wanting to move him. our desire to move him is atleast 99% about acquiring offensive talent.

Unless there's something more to us wanting Atogwe and Carriker from the Rams.. I wouldn't say 99% at all

I'd say most of it had to do with the bonus, then playing position issues and possible picks somehow round the majority out.. pure speculation though

You can make it as clear as you want but do either one of us know?

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by tryfuhl

Unless there's something more to us wanting Atogwe and Carriker from the Rams.. I wouldn't say 99% at all

I'd say most of it had to do with the bonus, then playing position issues and possible picks somehow round the majority out.. pure speculation though

You can make it as clear as you want but do either one of us know?

Even in that scenario, we'd likely get a pick in return. And it would also be able to use less picks on our defense and more on our offense. Either way, trading Haynesworth would give us more 3-4 players and more offensive talent.