![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,544
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Adam Schefter reported on his twitter page
NFL execs believe one reason Eagles traded McNabb to Redskins was so Washington could not acquire Oklahoma QB Sam Bradford. More @ espn.com. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
I can see that as a reason. But, I still don't see how we would have gotten Bradford, so it still seems like a gamble on their part
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Yeah, to me part of the reason for our trading was that it became clear that we weren't getting Bradford.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|